I argue that the human being fits squarely within the natural world in Aristotle’s anthropology. Like other natural beings, we strive to fulfill our end from the potential within us to achieve that end. Logos does not make human beings unnatural but makes us responsible for our actualization. As rational, the human can never be reduced to mere living animal but is always already concerned with living well; yet, as natural, she is not separated from the animal world, a dangerous distinction which inevitably leaves some persons reduced to mere animality
Aristóteles escribió varios tratados sobre los animales pero ninguno específico sobre el hombre. Nue...
Kant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically distinct e...
In this paper I examine a well-known articulation of the skeptical view of human nature, a paper by ...
I argue that the human being fits squarely within the natural world in Aristotle’s anthropology. Lik...
“What is the nature of the beings that we are?” is perhaps the most difficult question. ...
Exploring Aristotle\u27s concept of logos, this volume advances our understanding of it as a singula...
Aristotle famously pointed out that humans stand out from other living beings because humans are rat...
This paper considers the question of whether there is a human-animal or ‘anthropological difference'...
We are within nature and culture, conditioned simultaneously by genes and meanings. This form of our...
This paper examines Aristotle’s two famous claims that man is by nature a political animal, and that...
This chapter argues that, for Aristotle, human emotions are both different from, and also importantl...
20 pagesKant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically di...
[penultimate draft; prepared for publication in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals: A Critical Guide, ed....
Martin Heidegger rejects the traditional definition of the human being as the “rational animal” in p...
This dissertation gives an account of Kant’s understanding of the human animal through examination o...
Aristóteles escribió varios tratados sobre los animales pero ninguno específico sobre el hombre. Nue...
Kant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically distinct e...
In this paper I examine a well-known articulation of the skeptical view of human nature, a paper by ...
I argue that the human being fits squarely within the natural world in Aristotle’s anthropology. Lik...
“What is the nature of the beings that we are?” is perhaps the most difficult question. ...
Exploring Aristotle\u27s concept of logos, this volume advances our understanding of it as a singula...
Aristotle famously pointed out that humans stand out from other living beings because humans are rat...
This paper considers the question of whether there is a human-animal or ‘anthropological difference'...
We are within nature and culture, conditioned simultaneously by genes and meanings. This form of our...
This paper examines Aristotle’s two famous claims that man is by nature a political animal, and that...
This chapter argues that, for Aristotle, human emotions are both different from, and also importantl...
20 pagesKant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically di...
[penultimate draft; prepared for publication in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals: A Critical Guide, ed....
Martin Heidegger rejects the traditional definition of the human being as the “rational animal” in p...
This dissertation gives an account of Kant’s understanding of the human animal through examination o...
Aristóteles escribió varios tratados sobre los animales pero ninguno específico sobre el hombre. Nue...
Kant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically distinct e...
In this paper I examine a well-known articulation of the skeptical view of human nature, a paper by ...