The timing of turn taking in conversation is extremely rapid given the cognitive demands on speakers to comprehend, plan and execute turns in real time. Findings from psycholinguistics predict that the timing of turn taking is influenced by demands on processing, such as word frequency or syntactic complexity. An alternative view comes from the field of conversation analysis, which predicts that the rules of turn-taking and sequence organization may dictate the variation in gap durations (e.g. the functional role of each turn in communication). In this paper, we estimate the role of these two different kinds of factors in determining the speed of turn-taking in conversation. We use the Switchboard corpus of English telephone conversation, a...
In conversation, interlocutors rarely leave long gaps between turns, suggesting that next speakers b...
Corpus analyses have shown that turn-taking in conversation is much faster than laboratory studies o...
Wesselmeier H, Jansen S, Müller HM. Influences of semantic and syntactic incongruence on readiness p...
The timing of turn taking in conversation is extremely rapid given the cognitive demands on speakers...
The core niche for language use is in verbal interaction, involving the rapid exchange of turns at t...
The core use of language is in face-to-face conversation. This is characterized by rapid turn-taking...
The core use of language is in face-to-face conversation. This is characterized by rapid turn-taking...
Corpus analyses have shown that turn-taking in conversation is much faster than laboratory studies o...
Most language usage is interactive, involving rapid turn-taking. The turn-taking system has a number...
When humans have a conversation with one-another, they generally take turns speaking one after the o...
For addressees to respond in a timely fashion, they cannot simply process the speaker's utterance as...
RTs in conversation, with average gaps of 200 msec and often less, beat standard RTs, despite the co...
In spoken interactions, interlocutors carefully plan and time their utterances, minimising gaps and ...
In conversation, interlocutors rarely leave long gaps between turns, suggesting that next speak- ers...
In every-day conversations, the gap between turns of conversational partners is most frequently betw...
In conversation, interlocutors rarely leave long gaps between turns, suggesting that next speakers b...
Corpus analyses have shown that turn-taking in conversation is much faster than laboratory studies o...
Wesselmeier H, Jansen S, Müller HM. Influences of semantic and syntactic incongruence on readiness p...
The timing of turn taking in conversation is extremely rapid given the cognitive demands on speakers...
The core niche for language use is in verbal interaction, involving the rapid exchange of turns at t...
The core use of language is in face-to-face conversation. This is characterized by rapid turn-taking...
The core use of language is in face-to-face conversation. This is characterized by rapid turn-taking...
Corpus analyses have shown that turn-taking in conversation is much faster than laboratory studies o...
Most language usage is interactive, involving rapid turn-taking. The turn-taking system has a number...
When humans have a conversation with one-another, they generally take turns speaking one after the o...
For addressees to respond in a timely fashion, they cannot simply process the speaker's utterance as...
RTs in conversation, with average gaps of 200 msec and often less, beat standard RTs, despite the co...
In spoken interactions, interlocutors carefully plan and time their utterances, minimising gaps and ...
In conversation, interlocutors rarely leave long gaps between turns, suggesting that next speak- ers...
In every-day conversations, the gap between turns of conversational partners is most frequently betw...
In conversation, interlocutors rarely leave long gaps between turns, suggesting that next speakers b...
Corpus analyses have shown that turn-taking in conversation is much faster than laboratory studies o...
Wesselmeier H, Jansen S, Müller HM. Influences of semantic and syntactic incongruence on readiness p...