This study investigates young children’s comprehension of spatial terms in two languages that categorize space strikingly differently. English makes a distinction between actions resulting in containment (put in) versus support or surface attachment (put on), while Korean makes a cross-cutting distinction between tight-fit relations (kkita) versus loose-fit or other contact relations (various verbs). In particular, the Korean verb kkita refers to actions resulting in a tight-fit relation regardless of containment or support. In a preferential looking study we assessed the comprehension of in by 20 English learners and kkita by 10 Korean learners, all between 18 and 23 months. The children viewed pairs of scenes while listening to sentences ...
The domain of space presents interesting properties that can best illustrate the debate concerning u...
International audienceDespite a growing interest for space in language, most research has focused on...
AbstractLanguages differ in how they encode spatial frames of reference. It is unknown how children ...
This study investigates young children’s comprehension of spatial terms in two languages that catego...
Among children’s earliest spatial words are topological forms like ‘in’ and ‘on’. Although these for...
Among children’s earliest spatial words are topological forms like ‘in’ and ‘on’. Although these for...
English-learning toddlers of 21 and 22 months were taught a novel spatial word for four actions resu...
Concepts of containment, support, and degree of fit were investigated using nonverbal, pref-erential...
English and Korean differ in how they lexicalize the components of motionevents. English characteris...
Children’s overextensions of spatial language are often taken to reveal spatial biases. However, it ...
According to linguistic relativity theory, language exerts a strong influence on the development of...
The Whorfian hypothesis, the thesis that the language one speaks has a strong and pervasive effect o...
The Whorfian hypothesis, the thesis that the language one speaks has a strong and pervasive effect o...
English and Korean differ in how they lexicalize the components of motionevents. English characteris...
Previous research has shown a link between the spatial words children use and their performance on s...
The domain of space presents interesting properties that can best illustrate the debate concerning u...
International audienceDespite a growing interest for space in language, most research has focused on...
AbstractLanguages differ in how they encode spatial frames of reference. It is unknown how children ...
This study investigates young children’s comprehension of spatial terms in two languages that catego...
Among children’s earliest spatial words are topological forms like ‘in’ and ‘on’. Although these for...
Among children’s earliest spatial words are topological forms like ‘in’ and ‘on’. Although these for...
English-learning toddlers of 21 and 22 months were taught a novel spatial word for four actions resu...
Concepts of containment, support, and degree of fit were investigated using nonverbal, pref-erential...
English and Korean differ in how they lexicalize the components of motionevents. English characteris...
Children’s overextensions of spatial language are often taken to reveal spatial biases. However, it ...
According to linguistic relativity theory, language exerts a strong influence on the development of...
The Whorfian hypothesis, the thesis that the language one speaks has a strong and pervasive effect o...
The Whorfian hypothesis, the thesis that the language one speaks has a strong and pervasive effect o...
English and Korean differ in how they lexicalize the components of motionevents. English characteris...
Previous research has shown a link between the spatial words children use and their performance on s...
The domain of space presents interesting properties that can best illustrate the debate concerning u...
International audienceDespite a growing interest for space in language, most research has focused on...
AbstractLanguages differ in how they encode spatial frames of reference. It is unknown how children ...