Malebranche is an occasionalist philosopher, which is to say he believes that God is the only cause with all creations being passive. He is also a Catholic priest, and therefore committed to the truth of his faith. Malebranche therefore must account for what miracles are in a metaphysical system where their direct causation by the divine does not provide any special distinction. This paper locates Malebranche’s solution to the apparent difficulty in a division between cases where God acts according to laws of nature and those where intervention is necessary lest the laws of nature lead God to negate any divine attribute.Master of Art
In this paper we explicate the notion of a miracle and highlight a suitable ontological framework fo...
In the following, I discuss briefly Kierkegaard’s view on miracles. I observe how Kierkegaard is onl...
The philosophical and theological debate between Nicola Malebranche and Antoine Arnauld is one of th...
The core thesis of Malebranche’s doctrine of occasionalism is that God is the sole true cause, where...
Abstract: The occurrence of miracles is often taken to be evidence for the existence of God. Even i...
Baruch Spinoza\u27s approach to the subject of miracles was distinctly naturalistic. Instead of bel...
ii.. rrI In this thesis I argue that the common philosophical strategy of arguing from the laws of n...
This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is ba...
One of Leibniz’s strongest arguments against the Occasionalists (including Malebranche) is that, si...
This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is ba...
According to Malebranche’s occasionalism, all cases of causation in the world are due to the action ...
Throughout the public opinion, mainstream media, scientific circles and even some theological circle...
Leibniz’s attitude towards occasionalism was notoriously ambivalent. On the one hand, he strove to d...
My purpose is to examine Malebranche�s refutation of Medieval and Late-Scholastic theories on effici...
285 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006.The 17th-century French philo...
In this paper we explicate the notion of a miracle and highlight a suitable ontological framework fo...
In the following, I discuss briefly Kierkegaard’s view on miracles. I observe how Kierkegaard is onl...
The philosophical and theological debate between Nicola Malebranche and Antoine Arnauld is one of th...
The core thesis of Malebranche’s doctrine of occasionalism is that God is the sole true cause, where...
Abstract: The occurrence of miracles is often taken to be evidence for the existence of God. Even i...
Baruch Spinoza\u27s approach to the subject of miracles was distinctly naturalistic. Instead of bel...
ii.. rrI In this thesis I argue that the common philosophical strategy of arguing from the laws of n...
This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is ba...
One of Leibniz’s strongest arguments against the Occasionalists (including Malebranche) is that, si...
This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is ba...
According to Malebranche’s occasionalism, all cases of causation in the world are due to the action ...
Throughout the public opinion, mainstream media, scientific circles and even some theological circle...
Leibniz’s attitude towards occasionalism was notoriously ambivalent. On the one hand, he strove to d...
My purpose is to examine Malebranche�s refutation of Medieval and Late-Scholastic theories on effici...
285 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006.The 17th-century French philo...
In this paper we explicate the notion of a miracle and highlight a suitable ontological framework fo...
In the following, I discuss briefly Kierkegaard’s view on miracles. I observe how Kierkegaard is onl...
The philosophical and theological debate between Nicola Malebranche and Antoine Arnauld is one of th...