Recklessness involves unreasonable/unjustified risk-taking. The argument here is that recklessness in the criminal law is best understood as nevertheless containing an element of reasonableness. To be reckless, on this view, the defendant must reasonably believe that she is exposing others to a risk of harm. If the defendant’s belief about the risk being imposed by her conduct is unreasonable, she should not (normally) be considered reckless. This point is most important in relation to offences of endangerment where recklessness sets the outer limits of criminal liability
The paradigmatic conception of criminal offences, and the most common justification offered for subj...
Doug Husak suggests that sometimes an actor should be deemed reckless, and not merely negligent, wit...
Tort law assesses negligence according to the conduct of a reasonable person of ordinary prudence wh...
Abstract: Recklessness involves unreasonable/unjustified risk-taking. The argument here is that reck...
Defining recklessness in criminal law has proved to be a great challenge for courts, legislatures an...
The case of R v G may have consigned “objective” Caldwell recklessness to the history books, but thi...
The word reasonable and its cognates figure prominently in innumerable areas of the law – from ant...
Law students discover very early in their legal educations that the reasonable person is a ubiquit...
Because they track the Model Penal Code, current criminal law formulations of risk offenses typicall...
Combating reckless or negligent driving is a focal point of road safety policy. The problem of reckl...
In order to be properly applied, criminal law must determine what conduct warrants punitive action....
According to what is here called the “Intoxication Recklessness Principle,” a defendant who, thanks ...
This dissertation analyzes three legal doctrines that regulate unintentional aspects of criminal con...
The reasonable person test is often employed in criminal law doctrine as a criterion of cognitive fa...
This paper deals with the subjective element of criminal negligence and the conceptual distinction b...
The paradigmatic conception of criminal offences, and the most common justification offered for subj...
Doug Husak suggests that sometimes an actor should be deemed reckless, and not merely negligent, wit...
Tort law assesses negligence according to the conduct of a reasonable person of ordinary prudence wh...
Abstract: Recklessness involves unreasonable/unjustified risk-taking. The argument here is that reck...
Defining recklessness in criminal law has proved to be a great challenge for courts, legislatures an...
The case of R v G may have consigned “objective” Caldwell recklessness to the history books, but thi...
The word reasonable and its cognates figure prominently in innumerable areas of the law – from ant...
Law students discover very early in their legal educations that the reasonable person is a ubiquit...
Because they track the Model Penal Code, current criminal law formulations of risk offenses typicall...
Combating reckless or negligent driving is a focal point of road safety policy. The problem of reckl...
In order to be properly applied, criminal law must determine what conduct warrants punitive action....
According to what is here called the “Intoxication Recklessness Principle,” a defendant who, thanks ...
This dissertation analyzes three legal doctrines that regulate unintentional aspects of criminal con...
The reasonable person test is often employed in criminal law doctrine as a criterion of cognitive fa...
This paper deals with the subjective element of criminal negligence and the conceptual distinction b...
The paradigmatic conception of criminal offences, and the most common justification offered for subj...
Doug Husak suggests that sometimes an actor should be deemed reckless, and not merely negligent, wit...
Tort law assesses negligence according to the conduct of a reasonable person of ordinary prudence wh...