Add to ORKGThis chapter suggests that for conceptual, empirical, and practical reasons, neuroscience in general and non-invasive brain imaging in particular are not likely to revolutionize the law and our conception of ourselves, but may make modest contributions to legal policy and case adjudication if the legal relevance of the science is properly understood
SummaryStunning technical advances in the ability to image the human brain have provoked excited spe...
Patterson deny that the activities of persons (knowl-edge, rule-following, interpretation) can be un...
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only ...
This chapter suggests that for conceptual, empirical, and practical reasons, neuroscience in general...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: Genetics may yet t...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: “Genetics may yet t...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: “Genetics may yet t...
Claims for the relevance and importance of neuroscience for law are stronger than ever. Notwithstand...
This is a pre-copyedited version of a chapter in the Oxford Handbooks Online (Philosophy) edited by ...
Legislators, jurists, and advocates often turn to science to solve complicated normative problems ad...
This chapter argues that the folk-psychological model of the person and responsibility is not challe...
According to a wide variety of scholars, scientists, and policymakers, neuroscience promises to tran...
This is a chapter in a volume, Ethics Challenges in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology Practice, edi...
In this Essay, we consider the contribution of a startling new book, Law & Neuroscience (L&N), by Ow...
This chapter considers the claims made on behalf of neuroscience in three areas: legal philosophy, e...
SummaryStunning technical advances in the ability to image the human brain have provoked excited spe...
Patterson deny that the activities of persons (knowl-edge, rule-following, interpretation) can be un...
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only ...
This chapter suggests that for conceptual, empirical, and practical reasons, neuroscience in general...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: Genetics may yet t...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: “Genetics may yet t...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: “Genetics may yet t...
Claims for the relevance and importance of neuroscience for law are stronger than ever. Notwithstand...
This is a pre-copyedited version of a chapter in the Oxford Handbooks Online (Philosophy) edited by ...
Legislators, jurists, and advocates often turn to science to solve complicated normative problems ad...
This chapter argues that the folk-psychological model of the person and responsibility is not challe...
According to a wide variety of scholars, scientists, and policymakers, neuroscience promises to tran...
This is a chapter in a volume, Ethics Challenges in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology Practice, edi...
In this Essay, we consider the contribution of a startling new book, Law & Neuroscience (L&N), by Ow...
This chapter considers the claims made on behalf of neuroscience in three areas: legal philosophy, e...
SummaryStunning technical advances in the ability to image the human brain have provoked excited spe...
Patterson deny that the activities of persons (knowl-edge, rule-following, interpretation) can be un...
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only ...