Comparisons of Medical Student Knowledge Regarding Life-Threatening CT Images Before and After Clinical Experience

Introduction. Currently, no national standard exists for educatingmedical students regarding radiography or formal research indicatingthe level of improvement regarding computed tomography(CT) interpretation of medical students during clinical rotations. Methods. Students were evaluated based on their response totwenty-two open-ended questions regarding diagnosis and treatmentof eleven de-identified CT images of life-threatening injuries.The number of incorrect answers was compared withcorrect or partially correct answers between students startingthird-year clinical rotations and those starting their fourth year. Results. Survey results were collected from 65 of 65 (100%) beginningthird-year students and 9 of 60 (15%) beginning fourthyearstudents. Students in their fourth-year had less incorrectanswers compared to third-year students, with five questionsreflecting a statistically significant reduction in incorrect responses.The image with the least incorrect for both groups wasepidural hemorrhage, 33.9% and 18.5% incorrect for third-yearstudents for diagnosis and treatment, respectively, and 11.1%and 0% incorrect for fourth-year students. Outside of this image,the range of incorrect answers for third-year students was75.4% to 100% and 44.4% to 100% for fourth-year students. Conclusion. Baseline CT knowledge of medical students,regardless of clinical experience, indicated a strong deficit,as more students were incorrect than correct for themajority of CT images. KS J Med 2017;10(3):55-58