AbstractIn this paper we extend de Nicola and Hennessy’s testing theory to deal with probabilities. We say that two processes are testing equivalent if the probabilities with which they pass any test are equal. We present three alternative semantic views of our testing equivalence. First, we introduce adequate extensions of acceptance sets (inducing an operational characterization) and acceptance trees (inducing a denotational semantics). We also present a sound and complete axiomatization of our testing equivalence. So, this paper represents a complete study of the adaptation of the classical testing theory for probabilistic processes
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
AbstractIn this paper we extend de Nicola and Hennessy’s testing theory to deal with probabilities. ...
AbstractIn this paper, refusal testing ideas are applied to define a testing semantics for a probabi...
AbstractWe develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theori...
We develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theories: prob...
We develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theories: prob...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
AbstractWe develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theori...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
AbstractIn this paper we extend de Nicola and Hennessy’s testing theory to deal with probabilities. ...
AbstractIn this paper, refusal testing ideas are applied to define a testing semantics for a probabi...
AbstractWe develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theori...
We develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theories: prob...
We develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theories: prob...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
AbstractWe develop a general testing scenario for probabilistic processes, giving rise to two theori...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processes...
One of the most studied extensions of testing theory to nondeterministic and probabilistic processe...