Periprocedural and Short-Term Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With the Sapien XT as Compared With the Edwards Sapien Valve

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the short-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien THV (ESV), compared with the Sapien XT THV (SXT) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California).BackgroundThe SXT has been recently commercialized in Europe, but there are no studies analyzing the efficacy and safety of SXT, compared with ESV.MethodsAll consecutive patients (n = 120) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation in our center via the transfemoral approach with either ESV (n = 66) or SXT (n = 54). Valve Academic Research Consortium endpoints were used.ResultsMean age was 80 ± 8 years, and mean Logistic-European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 24.9 ± 17.0. The ilio-femoral artery minimal lumen diameter was smaller in patients treated with the SXT (7.27 ± 1.09 mm vs. 7.94 ± 1.08 mm, p = 0.002). Device success was high in both groups (96.3% vs. 92.4%, p = 0.45). Major vascular events were 3-fold lower in the SXT group (11.1% vs. 33.3%, relative risk: 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.28 to 0.57; p = 0.004). Life-threatening and major bleeding events were not significantly different between groups (18.5% vs. 27.3% and 35.2% vs. 40.9%, respectively). The SXT group had a lower 30-day Valve Academic Research Consortium combined safety endpoint (20.4% vs. 45.5%; relative risk: 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.24 to 0.80; p = 0.004). The 30-day mortality was 1.7% (n = 2). At 30 days, mean transaortic gradient was approximately 10 mm Hg in both groups and the aortic regurgitation was mild-to-moderate in 70.2% of SXT and 76.3% of ESV.ConclusionsThe new SXT valve has the same short-term performance as the ESV but seems to be associated with a lower risk of major vascular complications and thus has a broader clinical application