Cost-effectiveness of Exercise Therapy in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Supervised Exercise Therapy versus a ‘Go Home and Walk’ Advice

AbstractObjectivesThe Exercise Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Disease (EXITPAD) study has shown supervised exercise therapy (SET) to be more effective regarding walking distance and quality of life than a ‘go home and walk’ advice (WA) for patients with intermittent claudication. The present study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of SET versus WA.Patients and methodsData from the EXITPAD study, a 12-month randomised controlled trial in 304 patients with claudication, was used to study the proportion of costs to walking distance and quality of life. Two different incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for SET versus WA: costs per extra metre on the treadmill test, and costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). QALYs were based on utilities derived from the EuroQoL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D).ResultsMean total costs were higher for SET than for WA (3407 versus 2304 Euros), mainly caused by the costs of exercise therapy. The median walking distance was 620 m for SET and 400 m for WA. QALYs were 0.71 for SET and 0.67 for WA. All differences were statistically significant. The ICER for cost per extra metre on the 12-month treadmill test was € 4.08. For cost per QALY, the ICER was € 28693.ConclusionAt a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 40 000 per QALY, SET likely is a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients with claudication