The effects of simulated cataract on reading with normal vision and simulated central scotoma

AbstractReading rates are slower for persons with low vision than for normally-sighted persons. This study investigated the change in reading performance and reading eye movements when we simulated the two most common causes of low vision — central field loss and cataract — and their combination (scotoma+cataract). Three subjects read sentences with each of these simulated impairments at five different letter sizes. They required larger letters to read with the cataract or scotoma than they did with normal vision, and larger still to read with scotoma+cataract; the change in eye movements relative to normal vision was similar across conditions. When reading large letters (1.61°), the cataract had almost no effect, while the scotoma and scotoma+cataract reduced reading rate for two of the subjects. The cataract had a greater impact on performance relative to normal vision for these same two subjects, while for the third subject the cataract had a greater impact with the scotoma in place. Cataract extraction tends to be postponed in patients with central field loss because it is not perceived to be beneficial. The findings from this study, as well as others, suggest that patients with central field loss would benefit from cataract extraction