AbstractIn the LATER model, randomness of saccadic latency arises through random variation in the rate of rise of the decision signal. But does it vary independently at different locations? If so, when pairs of targets are presented asynchronously, and the participant makes a saccade to the more salient one, the choice of target should be stochastic. Further, it should be possible to predict the probabilities at different asynchronies from the latency distributions for each target on its own. This study verifies the prediction in human subjects. In the real world, independent random variation of latency at different locations will give rise to randomness of choice of target
SummaryOne popular and fruitful approach to understanding what influences the decision of where to l...
Recent theories of visual attention, such as the oculomotor readiness theory of Klein (1980), the pr...
<p>Proportions of second saccades directed toward either of the two remaining singletons, separately...
AbstractIn the LATER model, randomness of saccadic latency arises through random variation in the ra...
AbstractWe investigated the effect of randomizing different spatial and temporal parameters on sacca...
When exploring the visual environment, one uses saccades to shift gaze and fixation to gather spatia...
AbstractMany factors influence how long it takes to respond to a visual stimulus. The lowest-level f...
AbstractLarge variability between individual response times, even in identical conditions, is a ubiq...
Large variability between individual response times, even in identical conditions, is a ubiquitous p...
Abstract When humans have to choose between different options, they can maximize their payoff by cho...
To gain insight into how human observers select items in the visual field we pitted two attentional ...
Models of perceptual decision making often assume that sensory evidence is accumulated over time in ...
One of the most common decisions we make is the one about where to move our eyes next. Here we exami...
AbstractThe variable latency of a saccade to the onset of a single target reveals our brain’s hypoth...
<p>Proportions of second saccades directed toward either of the two remaining singletons, separately...
SummaryOne popular and fruitful approach to understanding what influences the decision of where to l...
Recent theories of visual attention, such as the oculomotor readiness theory of Klein (1980), the pr...
<p>Proportions of second saccades directed toward either of the two remaining singletons, separately...
AbstractIn the LATER model, randomness of saccadic latency arises through random variation in the ra...
AbstractWe investigated the effect of randomizing different spatial and temporal parameters on sacca...
When exploring the visual environment, one uses saccades to shift gaze and fixation to gather spatia...
AbstractMany factors influence how long it takes to respond to a visual stimulus. The lowest-level f...
AbstractLarge variability between individual response times, even in identical conditions, is a ubiq...
Large variability between individual response times, even in identical conditions, is a ubiquitous p...
Abstract When humans have to choose between different options, they can maximize their payoff by cho...
To gain insight into how human observers select items in the visual field we pitted two attentional ...
Models of perceptual decision making often assume that sensory evidence is accumulated over time in ...
One of the most common decisions we make is the one about where to move our eyes next. Here we exami...
AbstractThe variable latency of a saccade to the onset of a single target reveals our brain’s hypoth...
<p>Proportions of second saccades directed toward either of the two remaining singletons, separately...
SummaryOne popular and fruitful approach to understanding what influences the decision of where to l...
Recent theories of visual attention, such as the oculomotor readiness theory of Klein (1980), the pr...
<p>Proportions of second saccades directed toward either of the two remaining singletons, separately...