A basic model of commitment is to convert a game in strategic form to a “leadership game” with the same payoffs, where one player commits to a strategy to which the second player chooses a best reply. This paper studies such leadership games for the mixed extension of a finite game, where the leader commits to a mixed strategy. The set of leader payoffs is an interval (for generic games a singleton), which is at least as good as the set of that player’s Nash and correlated equilibrium payoffs in the simultaneous game. This no longer holds for leadership games with three or more players
In this paper, we consider the commitment game of Hamilton and Sultsky (1990), and point out that th...
This paper compares the leader and follower payoff in a duopoly game, as they arise in sequential pl...
In this paper, we consider the extended game of action commitment in Hamilton & Slutsky (1990) with ...
A basic model of commitment is to convert a game in strategic form into a "leadership game&quo...
A basic model of commitment is to convert a two-player game in strategic form to a “leadership gam...
A basic model of commitment is to convert a two-player game in strategic form to a “leadership game”...
In multiagent systems, strategic settings are often analyzed under the assumption that the players c...
In this paper, we discuss a particular class of Nash games, where the participants of the game (the ...
In this paper, we discuss a particular class of Nash games, where the participants of the game (the ...
We parameterize commitment in leader-follower games by letting the leader publicly choose her action...
The standard approach to computing an optimal mixed strategy to commit to is based on solving a set ...
This thesis studies various equilibrium concepts in the context of finite games of infinite duration...
Leader-follower (LF) equilibria play a central role in several applications of game theory. In spite...
We show that the value of commitment is fragile in many standard games. When the follower faces a sm...
Real world players often increase their payoffs by voluntarily committing to play a fixed strategy, ...
In this paper, we consider the commitment game of Hamilton and Sultsky (1990), and point out that th...
This paper compares the leader and follower payoff in a duopoly game, as they arise in sequential pl...
In this paper, we consider the extended game of action commitment in Hamilton & Slutsky (1990) with ...
A basic model of commitment is to convert a game in strategic form into a "leadership game&quo...
A basic model of commitment is to convert a two-player game in strategic form to a “leadership gam...
A basic model of commitment is to convert a two-player game in strategic form to a “leadership game”...
In multiagent systems, strategic settings are often analyzed under the assumption that the players c...
In this paper, we discuss a particular class of Nash games, where the participants of the game (the ...
In this paper, we discuss a particular class of Nash games, where the participants of the game (the ...
We parameterize commitment in leader-follower games by letting the leader publicly choose her action...
The standard approach to computing an optimal mixed strategy to commit to is based on solving a set ...
This thesis studies various equilibrium concepts in the context of finite games of infinite duration...
Leader-follower (LF) equilibria play a central role in several applications of game theory. In spite...
We show that the value of commitment is fragile in many standard games. When the follower faces a sm...
Real world players often increase their payoffs by voluntarily committing to play a fixed strategy, ...
In this paper, we consider the commitment game of Hamilton and Sultsky (1990), and point out that th...
This paper compares the leader and follower payoff in a duopoly game, as they arise in sequential pl...
In this paper, we consider the extended game of action commitment in Hamilton & Slutsky (1990) with ...