How useful are Primary Trauma Care courses in sub-Saharan Africa?

AbstractIntroductionMore than five million deaths occur each year from injury with the vast majority occurring in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Africa bears the highest road traffic related mortality rates in the world. Despite this, formal training in trauma management is not widely adopted in these countries. We report our results of 10 consecutive Primary Trauma Care (PTC) courses delivered in seven East and Central African countries, as part of the COSECSA Oxford Orthopaedic Link (COOL) initiative.MethodsCandidate's knowledge and clinical confidence in trauma management were assessed using a multiple-choice questionnaire and a confidence matrix rating of eight clinical scenarios. We performed descriptive statistical analysis on knowledge and clinical confidence scores of candidates before and after the course. We sub-analysed these scores, examining specifically the difference that exist between gender, job-roles and instructors versus non-instructors.ResultsWe have trained 345 new PTC providers and 99 new PTC instructors over the 10 courses. Data sets were complete for 322 candidates. Just under a third of candidates were women (n=94). Over two-thirds of candidates (n=240) were doctors, while the remainder comprised of nurses, medical students and clinical officers. Overall, the median pre-course MCQ score was 70% which increased to 87% post course (p<0.05). Men achieved a higher MCQ score both pre- and post-course compared to women (p<0.05); however there was no significant difference in the degree of improvement of MCQ scores between gender. Instructors outperform non-instructors (p<0.05), and similarly doctors outperform non-doctors on final MCQ scores (post-course). However, it was the non-doctors who showed a statistically significant improvement in scores before and after the course (20% non-doctors vs 16% doctors, p<0.05). Candidate's clinical confidence also demonstrated significant improvement following the course (p