Add to ORKGThe Court determined whether waiver of the “one-action rule” of NRS 40.430 terminates the procedural requirements for bringing a deficiency judgment action within six months of foreclosure under NRS 40.455
The Court concluded that an individual’s personal assets are not subject to discovery or execution m...
This article discusses a California case which held that a foreclosing lender’s 3-month time lim...
The Nevada Supreme Court received certified questions from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals under ...
The Court determined whether waiver of the “one-action rule” of NRS 40.430 terminates the procedural...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court held that NRS 11.190(1)(b)’s statute of limitations does not apply to nonjudicial foreclos...
The Court determined whether a district court may deny a motion to associate out-of-state counsel wh...
On rehearing, the Court determined that (1) calculation of prejudgment interest begins at the time a...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
The subsequent discovery of fraud does not provide good cause for overcoming a default of the 30-day...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court held NRS 271.595 creates two redemption periods; one of two years and one of 60-days. The ...
The Court concluded that an individual’s personal assets are not subject to discovery or execution m...
This article discusses a California case which held that a foreclosing lender’s 3-month time lim...
The Nevada Supreme Court received certified questions from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals under ...
The Court determined whether waiver of the “one-action rule” of NRS 40.430 terminates the procedural...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court held that NRS 11.190(1)(b)’s statute of limitations does not apply to nonjudicial foreclos...
The Court determined whether a district court may deny a motion to associate out-of-state counsel wh...
On rehearing, the Court determined that (1) calculation of prejudgment interest begins at the time a...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
The subsequent discovery of fraud does not provide good cause for overcoming a default of the 30-day...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court held NRS 271.595 creates two redemption periods; one of two years and one of 60-days. The ...
The Court concluded that an individual’s personal assets are not subject to discovery or execution m...
This article discusses a California case which held that a foreclosing lender’s 3-month time lim...
The Nevada Supreme Court received certified questions from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals under ...