Add to ORKGConsiders the rules of evidence on the admissibility of expert psychological evidence in criminal cases. Discusses the evaluation of the credibility of a witness and credibility and the admissibility of expert evidence. Proposes that expert evidence as to behavior should be admitted
While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert witness i...
The thesis called "Expert proofs" deals with one of the types of proper evidence which is applied in...
In H.M. Advocate v. Grimmond 1 the judge in a Scottish High Court trial refused permission for exper...
Considers the rules of evidence on the admissibility of expert psychological evidence in criminal ca...
Analyses the recent, sweeping changes to Scottish criminal evidence law and what they entailScottish...
Analyses the recent, sweeping changes to Scottish criminal evidence law and what they entail Scottis...
The aim of thesis is to evaluate the current practice of assessing the credibility of testimony in c...
Evaluates whether Young (Thomas Ross) v HM Advocate (HCJ), which set out a five-stage test of "suffi...
On 20 November 2007 the Scottish Ministers invited the Scottish Law Commission to consider, inter al...
Evaluates whether Young (Thomas Ross) v HM Advocate (HCJ), which set out a five-stage test of "suffi...
This thesis addresses the use of expert evidence in criminal trial proceedings. The author's primary...
In line with the growing EU interest in cross-border gathering and use of evidence in criminal matte...
A comprehensive and detailed examination of the law of evidence in the broadest of civil and crimina...
An amendment to the Criminal Practice Direction issued by the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wale...
Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article con...
While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert witness i...
The thesis called "Expert proofs" deals with one of the types of proper evidence which is applied in...
In H.M. Advocate v. Grimmond 1 the judge in a Scottish High Court trial refused permission for exper...
Considers the rules of evidence on the admissibility of expert psychological evidence in criminal ca...
Analyses the recent, sweeping changes to Scottish criminal evidence law and what they entailScottish...
Analyses the recent, sweeping changes to Scottish criminal evidence law and what they entail Scottis...
The aim of thesis is to evaluate the current practice of assessing the credibility of testimony in c...
Evaluates whether Young (Thomas Ross) v HM Advocate (HCJ), which set out a five-stage test of "suffi...
On 20 November 2007 the Scottish Ministers invited the Scottish Law Commission to consider, inter al...
Evaluates whether Young (Thomas Ross) v HM Advocate (HCJ), which set out a five-stage test of "suffi...
This thesis addresses the use of expert evidence in criminal trial proceedings. The author's primary...
In line with the growing EU interest in cross-border gathering and use of evidence in criminal matte...
A comprehensive and detailed examination of the law of evidence in the broadest of civil and crimina...
An amendment to the Criminal Practice Direction issued by the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wale...
Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article con...
While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert witness i...
The thesis called "Expert proofs" deals with one of the types of proper evidence which is applied in...
In H.M. Advocate v. Grimmond 1 the judge in a Scottish High Court trial refused permission for exper...