Including results from unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review may ameliorate the effect of publication bias in systematic review results. Unpublished RCTs are sometimes described in abstracts presented at conferences, included in trials registers, or both. Trial results may not be available in a trials register and abstracts describing RCT results often lack study design information. Complementary information from a trials register record may be sufficient to allow reliable inclusion of an unpublished RCT only available as an abstract in a systematic review. outcomes and coded matches as complete, partial, or no match. than in the abstract (141/258 (55%) versus 55/258 (21%)). We found no association between t...
BACKGROUND: Clinical trial results registries may contain relevant unpublished information. Our main...
Clinical trials and basic science studies without statistically significant results are less likely ...
Objectives: Trial registration has a great potential to increase research transparency and public ac...
Including results from unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review may am...
BACKGROUND:Including results from unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic re...
Background Including results from unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic re...
To reduce publication bias, systematic reviewers are advised to search conference abstracts to ident...
PURPOSE: To reduce publication bias, systematic reviewers are advised to search conference abstracts...
BACKGROUND: Publication of complete trial results is essential if people are to be able to make well...
Conference abstracts present information that helps clinicians and researchers to decide whether to ...
Purpose: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors mandates trial registration as a pre...
Background: In September 2005, scientific journals began requiring trial protocol registration to i...
Background & aims: Results of randomized clinical trials are often first presented as conference abs...
Abstract: Publication bias occurs when results of published studies are systematically different fro...
OBJECTIVES: To assess how trial information reported in conference abstracts differs to their subseq...
BACKGROUND: Clinical trial results registries may contain relevant unpublished information. Our main...
Clinical trials and basic science studies without statistically significant results are less likely ...
Objectives: Trial registration has a great potential to increase research transparency and public ac...
Including results from unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review may am...
BACKGROUND:Including results from unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic re...
Background Including results from unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic re...
To reduce publication bias, systematic reviewers are advised to search conference abstracts to ident...
PURPOSE: To reduce publication bias, systematic reviewers are advised to search conference abstracts...
BACKGROUND: Publication of complete trial results is essential if people are to be able to make well...
Conference abstracts present information that helps clinicians and researchers to decide whether to ...
Purpose: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors mandates trial registration as a pre...
Background: In September 2005, scientific journals began requiring trial protocol registration to i...
Background & aims: Results of randomized clinical trials are often first presented as conference abs...
Abstract: Publication bias occurs when results of published studies are systematically different fro...
OBJECTIVES: To assess how trial information reported in conference abstracts differs to their subseq...
BACKGROUND: Clinical trial results registries may contain relevant unpublished information. Our main...
Clinical trials and basic science studies without statistically significant results are less likely ...
Objectives: Trial registration has a great potential to increase research transparency and public ac...