209 How automatic algorithms are used in daily medical practice in dual chamber pacemaker recipients? Intermediate results from a prospective registry

ObjectiveAutomatic algorithms in pacemakers (PM) allow continuous adaptation of settings to patients’ clinical conditions. Some are dedicated to pacing and others to sensing. One of the objectives of BELUGA on-going, international, prospective registry was to evaluate the use of automatic algorithms available in Insignia™ PM in current medical practice.MethodsThe percentage (%) of activation of atrio-ventricular search hysteresis algorithm (AVSH), dynamic AV delay (DynAVD), automatic atrial/ventricular sensing (AAS/AVS), ventricular automatic capture (VAC) and the % of use of automatic ventricular threshold test during patients assessment (AVT) are reported at enrolment (Enrol), 3-6 months (FU1) and 9-12 months (FU2) in patients with dual chamber PM (pts).ResultsUp to now 804 pts were enrolled and followed during 9.5±3.9 months (age 76±9 years, 57% male, PR interval 196±34 ms, 40% sinus node dysfunction, 27% bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome, 10% 1°AV block, 33% paroxysmal 2° or 3° AV block). PM programming was left to the discretion of the investigator. Atrial and ventricular automatic sensing algorithms were used in less than half of the pts without any increase over the time. During follow-up, ventricular automatic capture algorithm and ventricular automatic threshold test were increasingly used (p<0.01). DynAVD and AVSH were continuously activated in most of the pts (see table).ParameterAAS on (%)AVS on (%)VAC on (%)AVT (%)AVSH on (%)DynAVD on (%)Enrol464069648597FU1453974688797FU2464076718797p (Enrol vs FU2)nsns<0.01