Does isolated myocardial bridge really interfere with coronary blood flow?

AbstractBackgroundMyocardial bridge (MB) is defined as a segment of a major epicardial coronary artery the “tunneled artery” that goes intramurally through the myocardium beneath the muscle bridge. Multiple methods have been proposed to assess coronary flow rate among which thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction frame count was a relatively new semiquantitative method.ObjectivesOur goal was to determine incidence of MB in the patients undergoing coronary angiography in Mansoura Specialized Hospital, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, also to investigate the hypothesis that slow coronary flow rate may be linked to angina or angina like symptoms in patients with MB without stenotic lesions in epicardial coronary arteries using TFC.Patients and methodsFifteen patients with MB (group I) were retrospectively collected from Mansoura Specialized Hospital, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, we review 3000 cases referred to diagnostic coronary angiography to exclude significant coronary artery disease. Fifteen patients with normal coronary angiography served as control (group II). We review the clinical presentations, risk factors, echocardiographic data for both test and control groups. TFC was calculated using a simple continuous index.ResultsThe incidence of MB in our study was 0.5%. CTFC in LAD was significantly higher in the patients with MB compared with control. No significant correlation between TFC and echocardiographic parameters.ConclusionsMyocardial bridging must be considered especially in patients at low risk for coronary atherosclerosis but with angina like chest pain or established myocardial ischemia. We suggest that coronary blood flow is decreased in the patients with MB compared with the patients having normal coronary