AbstractThe consensus operator provides a method for combining possibly conflicting beliefs within the Dempster–Shafer belief theory, and represents an alternative to the traditional Dempster's rule. This paper describes how the consensus operator can be applied to dogmatic conflicting opinions, i.e., when the degree of conflict is very high. It overcomes shortcomings of Dempster's rule and other operators that have been proposed for combining possibly conflicting beliefs
In many areas, humans have to act on the basis of uncertain contradictory information. Evident examp...
We propose in this paper a new family of belief merging operators, that is based on a game between s...
International audienceDempster-Shafer theory is a formal framework for reasoning and decision-making...
AbstractThe consensus operator provides a method for combining possibly conflicting beliefs within t...
The consensus operator provides a method for combining possibly conflicting beliefs within the Demps...
Dempster's Rule is commonly described as an operator for fusing beliefs. While there are differ...
Abstract – The combination of possibly conflicting beliefs and evidence forms an important part of v...
We consider uncertain data which uncertainty is represented by belief functions and that must be com...
The problem of fusing beliefs in the Dempster-Shafer belief theory has attracted consid-erable atten...
We define a consensus postulate in the propositional belief merging setting. In a nutshell, this pos...
AbstractThe study of alternative combination rules in DS theory when evidence is in conflict has eme...
The context of this paper is the problem of merging data provided by several information sources, ...
Abstract. Belief merging operators combine multiple belief bases (a profile) into a collective one. ...
Dempster’s rule is traditionally interpreted as an operator for fusing belief functions. While there...
International audienceThis paper deals with propositional belief merging. The key problem in this se...
In many areas, humans have to act on the basis of uncertain contradictory information. Evident examp...
We propose in this paper a new family of belief merging operators, that is based on a game between s...
International audienceDempster-Shafer theory is a formal framework for reasoning and decision-making...
AbstractThe consensus operator provides a method for combining possibly conflicting beliefs within t...
The consensus operator provides a method for combining possibly conflicting beliefs within the Demps...
Dempster's Rule is commonly described as an operator for fusing beliefs. While there are differ...
Abstract – The combination of possibly conflicting beliefs and evidence forms an important part of v...
We consider uncertain data which uncertainty is represented by belief functions and that must be com...
The problem of fusing beliefs in the Dempster-Shafer belief theory has attracted consid-erable atten...
We define a consensus postulate in the propositional belief merging setting. In a nutshell, this pos...
AbstractThe study of alternative combination rules in DS theory when evidence is in conflict has eme...
The context of this paper is the problem of merging data provided by several information sources, ...
Abstract. Belief merging operators combine multiple belief bases (a profile) into a collective one. ...
Dempster’s rule is traditionally interpreted as an operator for fusing belief functions. While there...
International audienceThis paper deals with propositional belief merging. The key problem in this se...
In many areas, humans have to act on the basis of uncertain contradictory information. Evident examp...
We propose in this paper a new family of belief merging operators, that is based on a game between s...
International audienceDempster-Shafer theory is a formal framework for reasoning and decision-making...
DOI
Add to ORKG