AbstractWe consider the relation between the relativized polynomial time hierarchy and relativizations of Gill's class PP of sets recognizable in polynomial time by probabilistic Turing machines and of Valiant's class D≠P of sets polynomial time Turing reducible to functions that give the number of accepting computations of nondeterministic polynomial-time bounded Turing machines. The main result is that there exists an oracle set A such that PPA −(Π2P,A ∪ σ2P,A) ≠ ∅, with the corollary that also D ≠PA − (Π2P,A ∪ σ2P,A ≠ ∅. The proof is an application of Baker and Selman's technique for showing that σ2P,A ⊆ σ3P,A for some oracle set A
AbstractWell-known complexity classes such as NP, co-NP, ⊕P (PARITY-P), and PP are produced by consi...
AbstractThe principal result of this paper is a “positive relativization” of the open question “P = ...
The complexity class Θ^P_2, which is the class of languages recognizable by deterministic Turing mac...
AbstractWe consider the relation between the relativized polynomial time hierarchy and relativizatio...
AbstractWe investigate the time complexity of the following counting problem: for a given set of wor...
AbstractWe consider several questions on the computational power of PP, the class of sets accepted b...
The counting complexity classes are defined in terms of the number of accepting computation paths of...
AbstractBased on Valiant's class #P of all functions counting the number of accepting computations o...
We show that every set in the ΘP2 level of the polynomial hierarchy -- that is, every set polynomial...
AbstractIn this paper we show that the techniques introduced by Furst (1984), which connected oracle...
In this paper we show that the techniques introduced by Furst (1984), which connected oracle separat...
The polynomialtime many-one and Turing reducibilities, Karp and Cook reducibilities respectively, p...
An oracle X is constructed such that the exponential complexity class ΔEP,X2 equals the probabilisti...
AbstractWe give a logic-based framework for defining counting problems and show that it exactly capt...
AbstractBased on Valiant's class #P of all functions counting the number of accepting computations o...
AbstractWell-known complexity classes such as NP, co-NP, ⊕P (PARITY-P), and PP are produced by consi...
AbstractThe principal result of this paper is a “positive relativization” of the open question “P = ...
The complexity class Θ^P_2, which is the class of languages recognizable by deterministic Turing mac...
AbstractWe consider the relation between the relativized polynomial time hierarchy and relativizatio...
AbstractWe investigate the time complexity of the following counting problem: for a given set of wor...
AbstractWe consider several questions on the computational power of PP, the class of sets accepted b...
The counting complexity classes are defined in terms of the number of accepting computation paths of...
AbstractBased on Valiant's class #P of all functions counting the number of accepting computations o...
We show that every set in the ΘP2 level of the polynomial hierarchy -- that is, every set polynomial...
AbstractIn this paper we show that the techniques introduced by Furst (1984), which connected oracle...
In this paper we show that the techniques introduced by Furst (1984), which connected oracle separat...
The polynomialtime many-one and Turing reducibilities, Karp and Cook reducibilities respectively, p...
An oracle X is constructed such that the exponential complexity class ΔEP,X2 equals the probabilisti...
AbstractWe give a logic-based framework for defining counting problems and show that it exactly capt...
AbstractBased on Valiant's class #P of all functions counting the number of accepting computations o...
AbstractWell-known complexity classes such as NP, co-NP, ⊕P (PARITY-P), and PP are produced by consi...
AbstractThe principal result of this paper is a “positive relativization” of the open question “P = ...
The complexity class Θ^P_2, which is the class of languages recognizable by deterministic Turing mac...