The 2 primary types of studies that are used to test new drugs or procedures or compare competing drugs or types of procedures are randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OS). Although it would appear that RCTs always trump OS because they eliminate selection bias, there are many possible limitations to both types of studies, and these limitations must be carefully assessed when comparing the results of RCTs and OS. This state-of-the art review describes these limitations and discusses how to assess the validity of RCTs and OS that yield different conclusions regarding the relative merit of competing treatments/interventions
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis f...
The article describes the basic rules for conducting observational studies, in particular, registers...
Some authors argue that systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention studies should include ...
Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) constitute the gold standard for the generation of evi...
International audienceAfter looking at some case studies, we will remind in this paper how observati...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
The supposed superiority of randomized over non-randomized studies is used to justify claims about t...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
In evidence-based medicine, clinical research questions may be addressed by different study designs....
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is not a gold standard: it is a good experimental design in so...
Different study formats are preferred for different research objectives. Randomised controlled trial...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the strongest evidence for the efficacy of preventive an...
BACKGROUND: There have been ongoing efforts to understand when and how data from observational studi...
This chapter covers the current gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic interv...
The article discusses the main methods of evidence in modern medicine. Special attention is paid to ...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis f...
The article describes the basic rules for conducting observational studies, in particular, registers...
Some authors argue that systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention studies should include ...
Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) constitute the gold standard for the generation of evi...
International audienceAfter looking at some case studies, we will remind in this paper how observati...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
The supposed superiority of randomized over non-randomized studies is used to justify claims about t...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
In evidence-based medicine, clinical research questions may be addressed by different study designs....
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is not a gold standard: it is a good experimental design in so...
Different study formats are preferred for different research objectives. Randomised controlled trial...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the strongest evidence for the efficacy of preventive an...
BACKGROUND: There have been ongoing efforts to understand when and how data from observational studi...
This chapter covers the current gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic interv...
The article discusses the main methods of evidence in modern medicine. Special attention is paid to ...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis f...
The article describes the basic rules for conducting observational studies, in particular, registers...
Some authors argue that systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention studies should include ...