AbstractWe study the expressiveness of the most prominent representatives of the family of shared dataspace coordination languages, namely Linda, Gamma and Concurrent Constraint Programming.The investigation is carried out by exploiting and integrating three different comparison techniques: weak and strong modular embedding and property–preserving encodings.We obtain a hierarchy of coordination languages that provides useful insights for both the design and the use of coordination languages
AbstractCoordination languages were introduced in the early 1980s as programming notations to manage...
In this paper we argue for an alternative way of designing cooperative constraint solver systems usi...
AbstractCoordination languages were introduced in the early 1980s as programming notations to manage...
AbstractA number of different coordination models for specifying inter-process communication and syn...
. A number of different coordination models for specifying inter-process communication and synchroni...
We compare Gamma and Linda, two of the most prominent coordination languages based on generative com...
AbstractSince Linda, many differents coordination models using shared dataspaces have been developpe...
International audienceBuilding upon previous work by the authors, this paper reviews and proposes ex...
We compare Gamma and Linda, two of the most prominent coordination languages based on generative com...
We compare Gamma and Linda, two of the most prominent coordination languages based on generative com...
The expressiveness of communication primitives has been explored in a common framework based on the ...
The expressiveness of communication primitives has been explored in a common framework based on the ...
. We discuss three software architectures for coordination. All architectures are based on agents. E...
In this paper we argue for an alternative way of designing cooperative constraint solver systems usi...
textabstractIn this paper we argue for an alternative way of designing cooperative constraint solver...
AbstractCoordination languages were introduced in the early 1980s as programming notations to manage...
In this paper we argue for an alternative way of designing cooperative constraint solver systems usi...
AbstractCoordination languages were introduced in the early 1980s as programming notations to manage...
AbstractA number of different coordination models for specifying inter-process communication and syn...
. A number of different coordination models for specifying inter-process communication and synchroni...
We compare Gamma and Linda, two of the most prominent coordination languages based on generative com...
AbstractSince Linda, many differents coordination models using shared dataspaces have been developpe...
International audienceBuilding upon previous work by the authors, this paper reviews and proposes ex...
We compare Gamma and Linda, two of the most prominent coordination languages based on generative com...
We compare Gamma and Linda, two of the most prominent coordination languages based on generative com...
The expressiveness of communication primitives has been explored in a common framework based on the ...
The expressiveness of communication primitives has been explored in a common framework based on the ...
. We discuss three software architectures for coordination. All architectures are based on agents. E...
In this paper we argue for an alternative way of designing cooperative constraint solver systems usi...
textabstractIn this paper we argue for an alternative way of designing cooperative constraint solver...
AbstractCoordination languages were introduced in the early 1980s as programming notations to manage...
In this paper we argue for an alternative way of designing cooperative constraint solver systems usi...
AbstractCoordination languages were introduced in the early 1980s as programming notations to manage...