Cost-Effectiveness of Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of first-line cisplatin/pemetrexed (Cis/Pem) compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine (Cis/Gem), carboplatin/paclitaxel (Carb/Pac), and carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (Carb/Pac/Bev) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in those with nonsquamous cell histology (i.e., adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, or histology not otherwise specified).MethodsA semi-Markov model was developed to compare the 2-year impact of Cis/Pem to three other first-line regimens from the U.S. payer perspective. Data from the randomized controlled clinical trial of Cis/Pem versus Cis/Gem and a mixed treatment comparison model (no head-to-head data were available for the Cis/Pem to Carb/Pac or Carb/Pac/Bev comparisons) provided clinical inputs. Medicare reimbursement rates were used to determine drug costs. A retrospective claims database analysis was used to obtain estimates of other direct NSCLC-related costs.ResultsIn all patients with advanced NSCLC regardless of histologic subtype, using Cis/Pem as first-line chemotherapy led to an incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG) of $104,577 for Cis/Pem to Cis/Gem and $231,291 for Cis/Pem to Carb/Pac. In the prespecified subset of patients with nonsquamous cell histology, the incremental cost per LYG was $83,537 for Cis/Pem to Cis/Gem and $178,613 for Cis/Pem to Carb/Pac. The incremental cost per LYG for Carb/Pac/Bev to Cis/Pem was more than $300,000.ConclusionsCompared with commonly used and reimbursed regimens for first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, Cis/Pem may be considered cost-effective, particularly in patients with nonsquamous cell histology. This analysis emphasizes the importance of histology in identifying the appropriate patient for Cis/Pem first-line chemotherapy