This work aims at analyzing the principle of observability (PO) from the formal point of view, making use of its explicit (ontological and epistemological) definitions. It will be made clear that our contemporary interpretation of PO is directly associated with the so called stage of empirical weightlessness of a theory (SEWT). It will be made clear, too, that it is SEWT exactly that offers ample opportunities in both substantiation of PO and substantiation of van Fraassen's thesis: Emp Ad (L) → (Real (X) → ¬Obs (X))
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
According to Bas van Fraassen, scientific realists and anti-realists disagree about whether acceptin...
Empiricists claim that in accepting a scientific theory one should not commit oneself to claims abou...
There is a natural objection to the epistemic coherence of Bas van Fraassen’s use of a distinction b...
I develop a concept of observability that pertains to qualities rather than objects: a quality is ob...
Van Fraassen’s distinction between observable and non-observable objects and his pragmatic conceptio...
This paper presents a sketch of a moderately anti-realist position in philosophy of science that is ...
The emphasis on the role of observation, one of the hallmarks of Empiricism, is reaffirmed by the pr...
Several arguments (due to Friedman, Kukla, Foss, Musgrave and Creath) to the effect that the distinc...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
ABSTRACT. In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerne...
The goal of this thesis is to explore the debate between Bas van Fraassen’s constructive empiricism ...
I show that the central notion of Constructive Empiricism, empirical adequacy, can be expressed synt...
In the spirit of B.C. van Fraassen's view of science called Constructive Empiri-cism, we propos...
The concept of observability is of key importance for a consistent defense of Constructive Empiricis...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
According to Bas van Fraassen, scientific realists and anti-realists disagree about whether acceptin...
Empiricists claim that in accepting a scientific theory one should not commit oneself to claims abou...
There is a natural objection to the epistemic coherence of Bas van Fraassen’s use of a distinction b...
I develop a concept of observability that pertains to qualities rather than objects: a quality is ob...
Van Fraassen’s distinction between observable and non-observable objects and his pragmatic conceptio...
This paper presents a sketch of a moderately anti-realist position in philosophy of science that is ...
The emphasis on the role of observation, one of the hallmarks of Empiricism, is reaffirmed by the pr...
Several arguments (due to Friedman, Kukla, Foss, Musgrave and Creath) to the effect that the distinc...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
ABSTRACT. In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerne...
The goal of this thesis is to explore the debate between Bas van Fraassen’s constructive empiricism ...
I show that the central notion of Constructive Empiricism, empirical adequacy, can be expressed synt...
In the spirit of B.C. van Fraassen's view of science called Constructive Empiri-cism, we propos...
The concept of observability is of key importance for a consistent defense of Constructive Empiricis...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
According to Bas van Fraassen, scientific realists and anti-realists disagree about whether acceptin...
Empiricists claim that in accepting a scientific theory one should not commit oneself to claims abou...