Against the background of a dispute with K. Jaspers, this article considers the Critique of Pure Reason as a system of epistemology and an overview of Kant’s philosophical system. The central thesis is the statement that Kant’s epistemology is based on transcendental anthropology connected with the history of philosophy. It is proven that, in terms of its content, the formal dual division of the Critique is a triad system comprising a number of similar subsystems
Kant’s understanding of the concept 'system’ does not correspond to that of his predecessors, nor ha...
The section of the Canon in the Critique of pure reason dedicated to Having an opinion, knowing and ...
There is no doubt that both Kant and Hegel saw their work as contributions to what they considered m...
Against the background of a dispute with K. Jaspers, this article considers the Critique of Pure Rea...
This article concludes the analysis of systematicity of the Critique of Pure Reason — the work that ...
This article continues to analyse the systemacity of the CPR as a text ensuring the integrity of Kan...
The article concerns some of the most important elements of I. Kant’s epistemology and its connecti...
peer reviewedWhile the Kantian epistemology was discovered for analytical philosophy by P. F. Straws...
The concept of “Transcendental” is the most fundamental concept of Kant’s theoretical philosophy. He...
A thorough analysis of the structure of the treatise constituting the first Critique and its compari...
The Epigenesis of Pure Reason: Systematicity in Kant's Critical Philosophy -- ...
Abstract The Critique of Pure Reason (CPR), at least by Kant’s own reckoning, is an extended reflect...
ABSTRACT. In his Critique of Pure Reason, Kant (1787/1998) suggested that scientific and humanistic ...
This volume sheds new light on Immanuel Kant’s conception of anthropology. Neither a careful and wid...
Kant\u27s anthropological works represent a very different side of his philosophy, one that stands i...
Kant’s understanding of the concept 'system’ does not correspond to that of his predecessors, nor ha...
The section of the Canon in the Critique of pure reason dedicated to Having an opinion, knowing and ...
There is no doubt that both Kant and Hegel saw their work as contributions to what they considered m...
Against the background of a dispute with K. Jaspers, this article considers the Critique of Pure Rea...
This article concludes the analysis of systematicity of the Critique of Pure Reason — the work that ...
This article continues to analyse the systemacity of the CPR as a text ensuring the integrity of Kan...
The article concerns some of the most important elements of I. Kant’s epistemology and its connecti...
peer reviewedWhile the Kantian epistemology was discovered for analytical philosophy by P. F. Straws...
The concept of “Transcendental” is the most fundamental concept of Kant’s theoretical philosophy. He...
A thorough analysis of the structure of the treatise constituting the first Critique and its compari...
The Epigenesis of Pure Reason: Systematicity in Kant's Critical Philosophy -- ...
Abstract The Critique of Pure Reason (CPR), at least by Kant’s own reckoning, is an extended reflect...
ABSTRACT. In his Critique of Pure Reason, Kant (1787/1998) suggested that scientific and humanistic ...
This volume sheds new light on Immanuel Kant’s conception of anthropology. Neither a careful and wid...
Kant\u27s anthropological works represent a very different side of his philosophy, one that stands i...
Kant’s understanding of the concept 'system’ does not correspond to that of his predecessors, nor ha...
The section of the Canon in the Critique of pure reason dedicated to Having an opinion, knowing and ...
There is no doubt that both Kant and Hegel saw their work as contributions to what they considered m...