One of the most potent criticisms of the TEI as a means for describing documents is that it is deterministic: it forces upon a text a set of a priori categories and thus largely determines how the text is understood. My contention is that critiques offered by scholars such as Jerome McGann can be answered in part by modifying one's conception of the text's poietic frame. If the entire process of editing is conceived of as an autopoietic system, the act of marking the text according to the TEI standards becomes but one stage of a process that is repeatedly questioned and open to revision. By conceiving of the system as editorial interaction with successive iterations of the text, the editor is made aware of the inherent textual and linguisti...
In this, part two of a two part paper, we will discuss our approach to the formalisation of our docu...
In this article, we will discuss an editing model that highlights the plurality of texts and paratex...
In this article we argue that digital scholarly editing still obeys a representational logic which p...
Jerome McGann has explained the functioning of text by appealing to systems theory, explaining that ...
Scholarly editing and textual digitisation are typically seen as two distinct, though related, fiel...
International audienceProvocative yet sober, Digital Critical Editions examines how transitioning fr...
The essay describes and reflects on the changes and transformations induced in scholarly editorial p...
Consciously or otherwise, readers have traditionally looked to editors as guarantors of the quality ...
What are the consequences for data modelling when we think of critical edition not as a document, bu...
A book is generally seen as a trustworthy carrier of text because, once printed, text cannot be chan...
The classical form of a scholarly edition—a text, with an accompanying set of annotations that is ex...
The process of editing a text is, in the first instance, an act of imagination. An editor who has co...
This book provides an up-to-date, coherent and comprehensive treatment of digital scholarly editing,...
Note: at the publisher's request, copying and printing permissions are not enabled on this PDF file....
This volume presents the state of the art in digital scholarly editing. Drawing together the work of...
In this, part two of a two part paper, we will discuss our approach to the formalisation of our docu...
In this article, we will discuss an editing model that highlights the plurality of texts and paratex...
In this article we argue that digital scholarly editing still obeys a representational logic which p...
Jerome McGann has explained the functioning of text by appealing to systems theory, explaining that ...
Scholarly editing and textual digitisation are typically seen as two distinct, though related, fiel...
International audienceProvocative yet sober, Digital Critical Editions examines how transitioning fr...
The essay describes and reflects on the changes and transformations induced in scholarly editorial p...
Consciously or otherwise, readers have traditionally looked to editors as guarantors of the quality ...
What are the consequences for data modelling when we think of critical edition not as a document, bu...
A book is generally seen as a trustworthy carrier of text because, once printed, text cannot be chan...
The classical form of a scholarly edition—a text, with an accompanying set of annotations that is ex...
The process of editing a text is, in the first instance, an act of imagination. An editor who has co...
This book provides an up-to-date, coherent and comprehensive treatment of digital scholarly editing,...
Note: at the publisher's request, copying and printing permissions are not enabled on this PDF file....
This volume presents the state of the art in digital scholarly editing. Drawing together the work of...
In this, part two of a two part paper, we will discuss our approach to the formalisation of our docu...
In this article, we will discuss an editing model that highlights the plurality of texts and paratex...
In this article we argue that digital scholarly editing still obeys a representational logic which p...