The Practice Statement of the House of Lords of 1966 posed the principle for the use of precedent in English law. The European Court of Human Rights developed its own stance on the authority of precedent in various judgments. The positions of the two jurisdictions on the issue are substantially the same. The precedents are to be followed and their authority is binding for the courts
In this paper, precedents are analysed in terms of reasons that they can give to judges in various l...
The paper is focused on the question when Constitutional Court’s of the Republic of Lithuania preced...
(with the Hon. Paul J. Watford & Marco Basile) How does the law of judicial precedent work in practi...
Tradiciškai teisminis precedentas yra laikomas pagrindiniu anglosaksų teisinės sistemos teisės šalti...
Despite the encroachment of legislation on matters that used to lie within the province of the commo...
This paper elucidates the common law doctrine of stare decisis and the methodology of using preceden...
There are some fundamental underlying requirements that need to be in place for a system of preceden...
This research has the objective of demonstrating the importance of the decisions of the Internationa...
What does it mean for a supreme court to ‘make law?’ When is it possible to say that its decisions a...
Recourse to precedents in legal adjudication is a source of intriguing theoretical challenges and se...
AcceptedArticleThis is the author's version of a work accepted for publication by Oxford University ...
Recourse to precedents in legal adjudication is a source of intriguing theoretical challenges and se...
The case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is one of the most important sourc...
What does it mean for a supreme court to “make law”? When is it possible to say that its decisions a...
This Article compares common law jurisdictions’ legal reasoning and use of precedents with those of ...
In this paper, precedents are analysed in terms of reasons that they can give to judges in various l...
The paper is focused on the question when Constitutional Court’s of the Republic of Lithuania preced...
(with the Hon. Paul J. Watford & Marco Basile) How does the law of judicial precedent work in practi...
Tradiciškai teisminis precedentas yra laikomas pagrindiniu anglosaksų teisinės sistemos teisės šalti...
Despite the encroachment of legislation on matters that used to lie within the province of the commo...
This paper elucidates the common law doctrine of stare decisis and the methodology of using preceden...
There are some fundamental underlying requirements that need to be in place for a system of preceden...
This research has the objective of demonstrating the importance of the decisions of the Internationa...
What does it mean for a supreme court to ‘make law?’ When is it possible to say that its decisions a...
Recourse to precedents in legal adjudication is a source of intriguing theoretical challenges and se...
AcceptedArticleThis is the author's version of a work accepted for publication by Oxford University ...
Recourse to precedents in legal adjudication is a source of intriguing theoretical challenges and se...
The case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is one of the most important sourc...
What does it mean for a supreme court to “make law”? When is it possible to say that its decisions a...
This Article compares common law jurisdictions’ legal reasoning and use of precedents with those of ...
In this paper, precedents are analysed in terms of reasons that they can give to judges in various l...
The paper is focused on the question when Constitutional Court’s of the Republic of Lithuania preced...
(with the Hon. Paul J. Watford & Marco Basile) How does the law of judicial precedent work in practi...