Abstract The problem of social choice is studied on a domain with countably many individuals. In contrast to most of the existing literature which establish either non-constructive possibilities or approximate (i.e. invisible) dictators, we show that if one adds a continuity property to the usual set of axioms, the classical impossibilities persist in countable societies. Along the way, a new proof of the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem in the style of Peter Fishburn’s well known proof of Arrow’s impossibility theorem is obtained
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
AbstractThis paper extends impossibility theorems of Arrow and others to cases in which social compa...
This paper is an attempt to examine the main theorems of social choice theory from the viewpoint of ...
This paper considers social choice correspondences assigning a choice set to each non-empty subset o...
Arrow’s impossibility theorem has had several up dating after its initial formulation. In this note,...
Arrow’s impossibility theorem has had several up dating after its initial formulation. In this note,...
Arrow’s impossibility theorem has had several up dating after its initial formulation. In this note,...
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is concerned with the problem of finding a collective choice rule whic...
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is concerned with the problem of finding a collective choice rule whic...
AbstractArrow's impossibility theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over t...
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over the years...
Arrow's impossibility theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over the years...
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over the years...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
AbstractThis paper extends impossibility theorems of Arrow and others to cases in which social compa...
This paper is an attempt to examine the main theorems of social choice theory from the viewpoint of ...
This paper considers social choice correspondences assigning a choice set to each non-empty subset o...
Arrow’s impossibility theorem has had several up dating after its initial formulation. In this note,...
Arrow’s impossibility theorem has had several up dating after its initial formulation. In this note,...
Arrow’s impossibility theorem has had several up dating after its initial formulation. In this note,...
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is concerned with the problem of finding a collective choice rule whic...
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is concerned with the problem of finding a collective choice rule whic...
AbstractArrow's impossibility theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over t...
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over the years...
Arrow's impossibility theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over the years...
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is one of the landmark results in social choice theory. Over the years...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
AbstractThis paper extends impossibility theorems of Arrow and others to cases in which social compa...