The paper discusses the criteria adopted from 2016 by the ANVUR – the Italian Agency for the evaluation of the Universities and of the scientific research – in order to classify the scientific journals in the SSH fields, in which bibliometric indicators are not used. In particular, the paper analyzes the decision to create a class of excellence for journals and to assess the quality of articles, and of journals, using the VQR scores. Besides, the paper addresses problems connected to the peer-review, the methodology proposed by ANVUR in SSH evaluation, and highlights the lack of international guidelines and ethical criteria in scientific research evaluation
Some specificities of the Italian situation are outlined with respect to the origins of evaluation a...
Since before its first introduction in 2012, the list of journals of ``A class'' for Statistical Sci...
The Italian Research Evaluation assessment for the period 2004-10 (VQR 2004-10) has analyzed almost ...
The paper discusses the criteria adopted from 2016 by the ANVUR – the Italian Agency for the evaluat...
The paper discusses the criteria adopted from 2016 by the ANVUR – the Italian Agency for the evalua...
The article analyzes the role of the evaluation of scientific journals in the process of the evaluat...
Peer review, that is the evaluation process based on judgments formulated by independent experts, is...
The article analyzes the role of the evaluation of scientific journals in the process of the evaluat...
This paper formulates several critical remarks about the evaluation procedure of scientific journals...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
Below are some considerations following on from a past Editorial entitled “The evaluation of scienti...
<p>Is there a uniform set of mechanisms to ensure the quality of scientific papers before publicatio...
The Italian Research Evaluation assessment for the period 2004–10 (VQR 2004–10) has analyzed almost ...
L’articolo analizza la visibilità delle riviste umanistiche italiane nell'ambito dei principali stru...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
Some specificities of the Italian situation are outlined with respect to the origins of evaluation a...
Since before its first introduction in 2012, the list of journals of ``A class'' for Statistical Sci...
The Italian Research Evaluation assessment for the period 2004-10 (VQR 2004-10) has analyzed almost ...
The paper discusses the criteria adopted from 2016 by the ANVUR – the Italian Agency for the evaluat...
The paper discusses the criteria adopted from 2016 by the ANVUR – the Italian Agency for the evalua...
The article analyzes the role of the evaluation of scientific journals in the process of the evaluat...
Peer review, that is the evaluation process based on judgments formulated by independent experts, is...
The article analyzes the role of the evaluation of scientific journals in the process of the evaluat...
This paper formulates several critical remarks about the evaluation procedure of scientific journals...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
Below are some considerations following on from a past Editorial entitled “The evaluation of scienti...
<p>Is there a uniform set of mechanisms to ensure the quality of scientific papers before publicatio...
The Italian Research Evaluation assessment for the period 2004–10 (VQR 2004–10) has analyzed almost ...
L’articolo analizza la visibilità delle riviste umanistiche italiane nell'ambito dei principali stru...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
Some specificities of the Italian situation are outlined with respect to the origins of evaluation a...
Since before its first introduction in 2012, the list of journals of ``A class'' for Statistical Sci...
The Italian Research Evaluation assessment for the period 2004-10 (VQR 2004-10) has analyzed almost ...