Abstract Background Assessment of diagnostic tests, broadly defined as any element that aids in the collection of additional information for further clarification of a patient’s health status, has increasingly become a critical issue in health policy and decision-making. Diagnostic evidence, including the accuracy of a medical test for a target condition, is commonly appraised using standard systematic review methodology. Owing to the considerable time and resources required to conduct these, rapid reviews have emerged as a pragmatic alternative by tailoring methods according to the decision maker’s circumstances. However, it is not known if streamlining methodological aspects has an impact on the validity of evidence synthesis. Furthermore...
Use of medical tests should be guided by research evidence about the accuracy and utility of those t...
Background: Decisionmakers and guideline developers demand rapid syntheses of the evidence when time...
To treat or not to treat? The decision to administer or withhold treatment based on test results cou...
Abstract Background Assessment of diagnostic tests, b...
Background Assessment of diagnostic tests, broadly defined as any element that aids in the collecti...
Abstract Background Rapid reviews (RRs) have emerged ...
Rapid diagnostic tests are used for the determination of binary qualitative results not only uniquel...
Background: Rapid reviews have the potential to overcome a key barrier to the use of research eviden...
BACKGROUND Rapid reviews provide an efficient alternative to standard systematic reviews in respons...
INTRODUCTION: Rapid reviews are being produced with greater frequency by health technology assessmen...
More and more systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies are being published, but they c...
Clinicians have long relied upon diagnostic tests for ‘evidence’ of the presence or absence of a dis...
Abstract Background Decisionmakers and guideline developers demand rapid syntheses of the evidence w...
OBJECTIVE: Before introducing a test in clinical practice, its characteristics and added value shoul...
More and more systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies are being published, but they c...
Use of medical tests should be guided by research evidence about the accuracy and utility of those t...
Background: Decisionmakers and guideline developers demand rapid syntheses of the evidence when time...
To treat or not to treat? The decision to administer or withhold treatment based on test results cou...
Abstract Background Assessment of diagnostic tests, b...
Background Assessment of diagnostic tests, broadly defined as any element that aids in the collecti...
Abstract Background Rapid reviews (RRs) have emerged ...
Rapid diagnostic tests are used for the determination of binary qualitative results not only uniquel...
Background: Rapid reviews have the potential to overcome a key barrier to the use of research eviden...
BACKGROUND Rapid reviews provide an efficient alternative to standard systematic reviews in respons...
INTRODUCTION: Rapid reviews are being produced with greater frequency by health technology assessmen...
More and more systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies are being published, but they c...
Clinicians have long relied upon diagnostic tests for ‘evidence’ of the presence or absence of a dis...
Abstract Background Decisionmakers and guideline developers demand rapid syntheses of the evidence w...
OBJECTIVE: Before introducing a test in clinical practice, its characteristics and added value shoul...
More and more systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies are being published, but they c...
Use of medical tests should be guided by research evidence about the accuracy and utility of those t...
Background: Decisionmakers and guideline developers demand rapid syntheses of the evidence when time...
To treat or not to treat? The decision to administer or withhold treatment based on test results cou...