Forming intolerance to corruption behavior as a judicially undefned legal category and its content

Objective to assess the legal category ldquoformation of intolerance to corrupt behaviorrdquo for compliance with its requirements for legal defnitions. Methods the methodological basis of the study is the dialectical method of cognition and the general scientifc historical logical systemic and specifc scientifc methods grouping analysis synthesis comparison interpretation etc. based on it. Results based on the analysis of federal regional municipal and departmental normative legal acts regulating various aspects of life the author studies the term ldquointolerance to corrupt behaviorrdquo as well as the related and derived legal categories. It was found that the phrase ldquointolerance to corrupt behaviorrdquo is widespread not only in the Russian anticorruption legislation but also in other branches of legislation in different legal meanings which indicates the multivariance of its semantic load i.e. its linguistic uncertainty. It can be argued that the Russian lawmaking bodies violated the principle of the uniformity of legal terminology. To resolve this contradiction this legal category must be replaced with another term corresponding to the sense of anticorruption legislation. The term ldquoanticorruption worldviewrdquo is such a phrase meeting the requirements for legal defnitions. Scientific novelty for the frst time in the Russian legal science it was proved that the phrase ldquointolerance to corrupt behaviorrdquo is not a legally defned legal category. The author makes a proposal to exclude it from the current legislation. Practical significance it is proposed to the legislative bodies of Russia to exclude linguistically undefned term ldquointolerance to corrupt behaviorrdquo from the current Russian legislation and replace it with another more accurate in meaning and content term ndash ldquoanticorruption worldviewrdquo