This paper concerns a problem of expressing a dissenting opinion (Lat. votum separatum). The author attempts to show how undertaking this conventional act develops rationality, criticism or judge’s virtues. The article is also devoted to show tension between revealing a dissenting opinion and uniformity of judicature
none1siIn several Courts of last resort, judges are permitted to publish a dissenting opinion. This ...
Around the turn of the last century, many American lawyers wanted to ban dissenting opinions in all ...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAIn this text an expert law team of contributors r...
This paper concerns a problem of expressing a dissenting opinion (Lat. votum separatum). The author ...
Surprisingly, there has been very little research into separate opinions in the legal linguistics li...
The subject of this article is a dissenting opinion. Dissenting opinion, if it exists in country’s j...
This article introduces a ritual theory of judicial dissent. Conventional accounts of the functions ...
Although long considered alien to the civil law tradition, the publication of separate dissenting or...
The volume reflects on an instrument considered \u2013 whether right or wrong \u2013 extraneous to t...
Dealing with dissent, the paper focuses on the Italian experience and a very recent practice — the r...
The paper deals with the role and functions of the dissenting opinion in Constitutional Courts in a ...
This paper aims to present the act of dissent as at once unifying and divisive as a collective expre...
Common-law judgments tend to be more than merely judgments, for judges often make pronouncements tha...
I argue that dissenting opinions play an important role in the formation of precedent in the context...
In the collegial world of appellate judging, where the dominant impulse is consensus, dissents depar...
none1siIn several Courts of last resort, judges are permitted to publish a dissenting opinion. This ...
Around the turn of the last century, many American lawyers wanted to ban dissenting opinions in all ...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAIn this text an expert law team of contributors r...
This paper concerns a problem of expressing a dissenting opinion (Lat. votum separatum). The author ...
Surprisingly, there has been very little research into separate opinions in the legal linguistics li...
The subject of this article is a dissenting opinion. Dissenting opinion, if it exists in country’s j...
This article introduces a ritual theory of judicial dissent. Conventional accounts of the functions ...
Although long considered alien to the civil law tradition, the publication of separate dissenting or...
The volume reflects on an instrument considered \u2013 whether right or wrong \u2013 extraneous to t...
Dealing with dissent, the paper focuses on the Italian experience and a very recent practice — the r...
The paper deals with the role and functions of the dissenting opinion in Constitutional Courts in a ...
This paper aims to present the act of dissent as at once unifying and divisive as a collective expre...
Common-law judgments tend to be more than merely judgments, for judges often make pronouncements tha...
I argue that dissenting opinions play an important role in the formation of precedent in the context...
In the collegial world of appellate judging, where the dominant impulse is consensus, dissents depar...
none1siIn several Courts of last resort, judges are permitted to publish a dissenting opinion. This ...
Around the turn of the last century, many American lawyers wanted to ban dissenting opinions in all ...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAIn this text an expert law team of contributors r...
DOI
Add to ORKG