Developing and conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses is a complex process that requires many judgments and the input from a wide variety of stakeholders. This article presents an introduction on how to develop, conduct, and report these research studies. Veterinary clinicians should seek systematic reviews to address their research questions. Criteria for including meta-analyses in a systematic review are presented. However, before applying the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to a particular patient, clinicians should weigh a variety of issues. The quality of the review is particularly important
In an effort to better utilize published evidence obtained from animal experiments, systematic revie...
AbstractSystematic reviews and meta-analyses are widely accepted as the best means to synthesise qua...
animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Diss...
The objectives of this paper are to provide an introduction to meta-analysis and systematic review a...
In research aimed at improving human health care, animal studies still play a crucial role, despite ...
This database compiles systematic reviews (SRs) of animal studies (i.e., reviews that focused exclus...
Objective: Complete, accurate reporting of systematic reviews facilitates assessment of how well rev...
The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the translation of res...
Objectives: Systematic reviews are one of the major building blocks of evidence-based medicine. This...
Before starting a new animal experiment, thorough analysis of previously performed experiments is es...
Systematic review is a review that has been prepared using a systematic approach to minimising biase...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Before starting a new animal experiment, thorough analysis of previously performed experiments is es...
Systematic reviews are generally regarded by professionals in the field of evidence-based medicine a...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are increasingly popular study designs in clinical research. A ...
In an effort to better utilize published evidence obtained from animal experiments, systematic revie...
AbstractSystematic reviews and meta-analyses are widely accepted as the best means to synthesise qua...
animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Diss...
The objectives of this paper are to provide an introduction to meta-analysis and systematic review a...
In research aimed at improving human health care, animal studies still play a crucial role, despite ...
This database compiles systematic reviews (SRs) of animal studies (i.e., reviews that focused exclus...
Objective: Complete, accurate reporting of systematic reviews facilitates assessment of how well rev...
The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the translation of res...
Objectives: Systematic reviews are one of the major building blocks of evidence-based medicine. This...
Before starting a new animal experiment, thorough analysis of previously performed experiments is es...
Systematic review is a review that has been prepared using a systematic approach to minimising biase...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Before starting a new animal experiment, thorough analysis of previously performed experiments is es...
Systematic reviews are generally regarded by professionals in the field of evidence-based medicine a...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are increasingly popular study designs in clinical research. A ...
In an effort to better utilize published evidence obtained from animal experiments, systematic revie...
AbstractSystematic reviews and meta-analyses are widely accepted as the best means to synthesise qua...
animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Diss...