OBJECTIVE: To evaluate telephone speech perception in individuals who received cochlear implant in the period 1993-2003. METHODS: Twenty seven CI users were divided into pre and post-lingual groups, being the speech perception assessed in two stages: first by a list of sentences imposed on speakerphone with the same mapping used to evaluate the phone and, in a second stage, using the landline, landline phone adapter with CI and cell phone. RESULTS: In the group of pre-lingual hearing loss, 75% of subjects were able to maintain a dialogue with the interlocutor and 19% did so with difficulty. In the post-lingual group, 89% were able to maintain the dialogue with the interlocutor and 11% did so with difficulty. Both groups of subjects...
A group of 6 pre-lingual cochlear implantees were assessed for closed-set speech perception at diffe...
BACKGROUND Telecommunication is limited or even impossible for more than one-thirds of all cochle...
This is a publisher’s version of an article published in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology © 1985...
Purpose For cochlear implant users, the ability to use the telephone is often seen as an important l...
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of coupling method on telephone-...
Objectives: Speech recognition on the telephone poses a challenge for patients with cochlear implant...
PURPOSE In individuals with severe hearing loss, mobile phone communication is limited despite tr...
The purpose of this study was to examine telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. A question...
International audienceObjectives: Telephone use correlates with quality of life, and is one of the m...
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of mobile Voice over Interne...
The investigations were carried out for 5 listeners with a cochlear implant, 2 male and 3 female at ...
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the speech perception and speech understanding of...
Cochlear implants (CI) have proved to be a successful treatment for severely and profoundly deaf ind...
The aim of this study is to report our results in a group of prelingually deafened adults, who follo...
The outcome of cochlear implantation in patients with deafness of prelingual onset is largely unpred...
A group of 6 pre-lingual cochlear implantees were assessed for closed-set speech perception at diffe...
BACKGROUND Telecommunication is limited or even impossible for more than one-thirds of all cochle...
This is a publisher’s version of an article published in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology © 1985...
Purpose For cochlear implant users, the ability to use the telephone is often seen as an important l...
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of coupling method on telephone-...
Objectives: Speech recognition on the telephone poses a challenge for patients with cochlear implant...
PURPOSE In individuals with severe hearing loss, mobile phone communication is limited despite tr...
The purpose of this study was to examine telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. A question...
International audienceObjectives: Telephone use correlates with quality of life, and is one of the m...
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of mobile Voice over Interne...
The investigations were carried out for 5 listeners with a cochlear implant, 2 male and 3 female at ...
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the speech perception and speech understanding of...
Cochlear implants (CI) have proved to be a successful treatment for severely and profoundly deaf ind...
The aim of this study is to report our results in a group of prelingually deafened adults, who follo...
The outcome of cochlear implantation in patients with deafness of prelingual onset is largely unpred...
A group of 6 pre-lingual cochlear implantees were assessed for closed-set speech perception at diffe...
BACKGROUND Telecommunication is limited or even impossible for more than one-thirds of all cochle...
This is a publisher’s version of an article published in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology © 1985...