This article suggests five classes of effort that scientists can undertake to destroy the linear no-threshold hypothesis as the basis of radiation regulation in the United States. These are (1) pressure on regulators such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (2) presidential messages, (3) Congressional pressure, (4) educate physicians about low-dose radiation, and (5) work with journalists and media people
All procedures involving ionizing radiation, whether diagnostic or therapeutic, are subject to stric...
The great tragedy of science—the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact. —Huxley TH. Engl...
The Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) process is used by virtually all governmental agen- cies to compute i...
The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is the primary federal agency responsible for promulg...
This paper attempts to present a clear idea of what the linear (no-threshold) hypothesis (LH) is, ho...
Good scientific evidence continues to accumulate that contradicts and discredits the Linear No-Thres...
The linear no-threshold (LNT) assumption is over 70 years old and holds that all ionizing radiation ...
This article attempts to reconcile differences within the relevant scientific community on the effec...
The purpose of this Article is to assemble the available information on radio frequency and microwav...
Today's radiation safety norms are based on the linear no-threshold theory (LNT): extrapolation of t...
Large segments of Western populations hold sciences in low esteem. This trend became particularly pe...
The linear no-threshold (LNT) model of ionizing radiation–induced cancer assumes that every incremen...
An article by Jerome Puskin attempts to justify the continued use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) a...
Denial is the defining characteristic of radiation protection policy, which presumes that any amount...
An article by Jerome Puskin attempts to justify the continued use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) a...
All procedures involving ionizing radiation, whether diagnostic or therapeutic, are subject to stric...
The great tragedy of science—the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact. —Huxley TH. Engl...
The Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) process is used by virtually all governmental agen- cies to compute i...
The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is the primary federal agency responsible for promulg...
This paper attempts to present a clear idea of what the linear (no-threshold) hypothesis (LH) is, ho...
Good scientific evidence continues to accumulate that contradicts and discredits the Linear No-Thres...
The linear no-threshold (LNT) assumption is over 70 years old and holds that all ionizing radiation ...
This article attempts to reconcile differences within the relevant scientific community on the effec...
The purpose of this Article is to assemble the available information on radio frequency and microwav...
Today's radiation safety norms are based on the linear no-threshold theory (LNT): extrapolation of t...
Large segments of Western populations hold sciences in low esteem. This trend became particularly pe...
The linear no-threshold (LNT) model of ionizing radiation–induced cancer assumes that every incremen...
An article by Jerome Puskin attempts to justify the continued use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) a...
Denial is the defining characteristic of radiation protection policy, which presumes that any amount...
An article by Jerome Puskin attempts to justify the continued use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) a...
All procedures involving ionizing radiation, whether diagnostic or therapeutic, are subject to stric...
The great tragedy of science—the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact. —Huxley TH. Engl...
The Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) process is used by virtually all governmental agen- cies to compute i...