The article introduces and critiques Antony Duff's Modest Legal Moralism from a strictly analytical angle. It seeks to illuminate its core tenets and modestly addresses a number of aspects that deserve further elaboration from the author's point of view. Notwithstanding these points of contention the main thrust of the article is the exploration of the constructive potential of Duff's concept. It will be shown that its core elements are well-equipped to come to grips with the lacuna of theorization of supranational criminal justice systems and their criminalization processes
This is a review of Hyman Gross, Crime and Punishment: A Concise Moral Critique (Oxford: Oxford Univ...
Theories of criminalisation seek to identify the criteria by which behaviour is legitimately crimina...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
R.A. Duff’s The Realm of the Criminal Law advances the literature on criminalization by providing th...
After distinguishing different types of Legal Moralism (positive/negative; modest/ ambitious) I defe...
This review article critically examines R. A. Duff and Stuart P. Green’s wide-ranging Philosophical ...
In this paper I explore Antony Duff’s claim that there are categorical constraints on the scope of t...
In his latest monograph, The Realm of Criminal Law, Antony Duff gives us a further, magisterial stat...
I shall use this occasion mostly to clarify what the legal moralist theory of criminal legislation p...
A Review of Harmless Wrongdoing: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law by Joel Feinber
The aim of this essay is to show that any attempt to define theoretical limits to the proper scope o...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
The topic of the legal enforcement of morals, understood as the “question of the legitimacy of ‘vice...
Many writers defend or attack the position nowadays known as legal moralism. According to the most ...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
This is a review of Hyman Gross, Crime and Punishment: A Concise Moral Critique (Oxford: Oxford Univ...
Theories of criminalisation seek to identify the criteria by which behaviour is legitimately crimina...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
R.A. Duff’s The Realm of the Criminal Law advances the literature on criminalization by providing th...
After distinguishing different types of Legal Moralism (positive/negative; modest/ ambitious) I defe...
This review article critically examines R. A. Duff and Stuart P. Green’s wide-ranging Philosophical ...
In this paper I explore Antony Duff’s claim that there are categorical constraints on the scope of t...
In his latest monograph, The Realm of Criminal Law, Antony Duff gives us a further, magisterial stat...
I shall use this occasion mostly to clarify what the legal moralist theory of criminal legislation p...
A Review of Harmless Wrongdoing: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law by Joel Feinber
The aim of this essay is to show that any attempt to define theoretical limits to the proper scope o...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
The topic of the legal enforcement of morals, understood as the “question of the legitimacy of ‘vice...
Many writers defend or attack the position nowadays known as legal moralism. According to the most ...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
This is a review of Hyman Gross, Crime and Punishment: A Concise Moral Critique (Oxford: Oxford Univ...
Theories of criminalisation seek to identify the criteria by which behaviour is legitimately crimina...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...