FIGURE 5 A. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus merokensis. Percentages are provided for each morphotype. Arrows indicate missing appendages. (A) Echiniscus merokensis merokensis
FIGURES 35–38. Echiniscus madonnae sp. nov. 35–36, second median plate (DIC and SEM, respectively), ...
The taxonomy of tardigrades is challenging as these animals demonstrate a limited number of useful m...
FIGURE 1. Echiniscus quitensis sp. n.: A, habitus (scale bar 30 μm). B, anterior portion of the body...
FIGURE 5 B. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus merokensis. Percentages are provided for e...
FIGURE 5B. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus merokensis. Percentages are provided for ea...
FIGURE 5A. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus merokensis. Percentages are provided for ea...
FIGURE 4. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus mediantus. Percentages are provided for each...
FIGURE 6. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus trisetosus. Percentages are provided for eac...
FIGURE 3. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus canadensis. Percentages are provided for eac...
Guil, Noemí (2008): New records and within-species variability of Iberian tardigrades (Tardigrada), ...
FIGURE 7. Double-claw photos from one Macrobiotus hystricogenitus specimen: (A) double-claws from th...
FIGURE 1. (A) Map of the Iberian Peninsula indicating with a box the study area in Madrid Province. ...
FIGURES 1 5. Echiniscus barbarae sp. nov. 1, Scanning electron micrograph, dorsal view (a paratype...
FIGURES 30–35. Interspecific appendage length variability in the spinulosus group (PCM): 30—Echinisc...
FIGURES 55 – 60. Echiniscus ollantaytamboensis. 55, second median plate in a younger animal (DIC), 5...
FIGURES 35–38. Echiniscus madonnae sp. nov. 35–36, second median plate (DIC and SEM, respectively), ...
The taxonomy of tardigrades is challenging as these animals demonstrate a limited number of useful m...
FIGURE 1. Echiniscus quitensis sp. n.: A, habitus (scale bar 30 μm). B, anterior portion of the body...
FIGURE 5 B. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus merokensis. Percentages are provided for e...
FIGURE 5B. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus merokensis. Percentages are provided for ea...
FIGURE 5A. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus merokensis. Percentages are provided for ea...
FIGURE 4. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus mediantus. Percentages are provided for each...
FIGURE 6. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus trisetosus. Percentages are provided for eac...
FIGURE 3. Morphological variability found in Echiniscus canadensis. Percentages are provided for eac...
Guil, Noemí (2008): New records and within-species variability of Iberian tardigrades (Tardigrada), ...
FIGURE 7. Double-claw photos from one Macrobiotus hystricogenitus specimen: (A) double-claws from th...
FIGURE 1. (A) Map of the Iberian Peninsula indicating with a box the study area in Madrid Province. ...
FIGURES 1 5. Echiniscus barbarae sp. nov. 1, Scanning electron micrograph, dorsal view (a paratype...
FIGURES 30–35. Interspecific appendage length variability in the spinulosus group (PCM): 30—Echinisc...
FIGURES 55 – 60. Echiniscus ollantaytamboensis. 55, second median plate in a younger animal (DIC), 5...
FIGURES 35–38. Echiniscus madonnae sp. nov. 35–36, second median plate (DIC and SEM, respectively), ...
The taxonomy of tardigrades is challenging as these animals demonstrate a limited number of useful m...
FIGURE 1. Echiniscus quitensis sp. n.: A, habitus (scale bar 30 μm). B, anterior portion of the body...
DOI
Add to ORKG