(A) Total energy of the system as a function of the attachment angle θ, for different values of the membrane–protein adhesion strength |W|. For |W| = |W|as ≃ 0.25 mN/m, the energy landscape has a minimum at θ = 0°. As |W| increases beyond this value, the attachment angle θ of the minimum energy state (i.e. the optimal attachment angle) moves continuously towards higher θ-values, reaching θ = 75° (corresponding to neck closure and scission) for |W| = |W|sc ≃ 0.56 mN/m. (B) Optimal attachment angle θ as a function of |W|. In both (A) and (B), the total area of the bud is nm2, corresponding to a final bud radius Rbu ≃ 42 nm.</p
By means of two supramolecular systems--peptide amphiphiles engaged in hydrogen-bonded β-sheets, and...
<p>(A). <i>c</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> = 0.2nm<sup>-1</sup>. (B) <i>c</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> = 0.2nm<su...
<p>The monolayers are laterally uncoupled. The elastic binding energy (A) and the relative binding ...
The radius of the membrane neck will become sufficiently small (Rne = 3 nm) and thus full neck closu...
(A) The change in the energy of the RBC bilayer/cytoskeleton composite as a function of wrapping ang...
(A) The constriction force is given by , with the total free energy as in Eqs 2 and 4 for the dome a...
(A) Starting with the arginine at the center of the membrane as in , the helix was held fixed, and t...
<p>(A) Minimum energy rescaled by the membrane bending rigidity as a function of the ESCRT binding...
<p>(A) Fore-fission state: - radius of the protein dome surface - the neck radius, - the attachment...
<p>The energy is plotted as a function of the enclosed filament helical radius , and the extension ...
<p>Calculated elastic interaction energy between two chemoreceptor trimers as a function of trimer o...
We determined the shape of membrane cylinder adherent to a flat support and derived the relationship...
<p>Energy values (in kJ/mol) obtained through MM+ geometry optimization of PAH-CD complexes under st...
(A) As a function of the cone apex angle α for fixed membrane–protein adhesion strength |W| = 0.2 mN...
<p>The landscapes are plotted <i>versus</i> the tumor's ellipsoidal axes ratios and . The origin ha...
By means of two supramolecular systems--peptide amphiphiles engaged in hydrogen-bonded β-sheets, and...
<p>(A). <i>c</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> = 0.2nm<sup>-1</sup>. (B) <i>c</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> = 0.2nm<su...
<p>The monolayers are laterally uncoupled. The elastic binding energy (A) and the relative binding ...
The radius of the membrane neck will become sufficiently small (Rne = 3 nm) and thus full neck closu...
(A) The change in the energy of the RBC bilayer/cytoskeleton composite as a function of wrapping ang...
(A) The constriction force is given by , with the total free energy as in Eqs 2 and 4 for the dome a...
(A) Starting with the arginine at the center of the membrane as in , the helix was held fixed, and t...
<p>(A) Minimum energy rescaled by the membrane bending rigidity as a function of the ESCRT binding...
<p>(A) Fore-fission state: - radius of the protein dome surface - the neck radius, - the attachment...
<p>The energy is plotted as a function of the enclosed filament helical radius , and the extension ...
<p>Calculated elastic interaction energy between two chemoreceptor trimers as a function of trimer o...
We determined the shape of membrane cylinder adherent to a flat support and derived the relationship...
<p>Energy values (in kJ/mol) obtained through MM+ geometry optimization of PAH-CD complexes under st...
(A) As a function of the cone apex angle α for fixed membrane–protein adhesion strength |W| = 0.2 mN...
<p>The landscapes are plotted <i>versus</i> the tumor's ellipsoidal axes ratios and . The origin ha...
By means of two supramolecular systems--peptide amphiphiles engaged in hydrogen-bonded β-sheets, and...
<p>(A). <i>c</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> = 0.2nm<sup>-1</sup>. (B) <i>c</i><sub><i>b</i></sub> = 0.2nm<su...
<p>The monolayers are laterally uncoupled. The elastic binding energy (A) and the relative binding ...