Comparison of the user click-through rate of best match versus the previous TF–IDF method and the default date sort order.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 2 for different methods.</p
<p>Performance Comparison with Existing Event Detection Methods (Precision, Recall, F-measure).</p
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
The comparison data of match rate between the traditional SIFT feature matching method and the propo...
Comparison of the relative arrival rate of order and the relative order price.</p
Comparison of interaction types in completion time and simultaneous users (in seconds).</p
The Cranfield evaluation method has some disadvantages, including its high cost in labor and inadequ...
Comparison of completion rates at different stages for the three recruitment channels.</p
<p>Comparison of classification rates between the proposed method and other methods.</p
Comparison of ranking time characteristics between ATP top 50 and top 51–100 Athletes.</p
The blue line represents the trend, and the blue area represents the variance. The vertical line den...
Comparison of the relative arrival rate of order and the relative shortage cost.</p
<p>A indicates the comparison of T1–T2 and V1–V2, B indicates the comparison of T2–T4 and V2–V4, C i...
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 1 for different methods.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 2 for different methods.</p
<p>Performance Comparison with Existing Event Detection Methods (Precision, Recall, F-measure).</p
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
The comparison data of match rate between the traditional SIFT feature matching method and the propo...
Comparison of the relative arrival rate of order and the relative order price.</p
Comparison of interaction types in completion time and simultaneous users (in seconds).</p
The Cranfield evaluation method has some disadvantages, including its high cost in labor and inadequ...
Comparison of completion rates at different stages for the three recruitment channels.</p
<p>Comparison of classification rates between the proposed method and other methods.</p
Comparison of ranking time characteristics between ATP top 50 and top 51–100 Athletes.</p
The blue line represents the trend, and the blue area represents the variance. The vertical line den...
Comparison of the relative arrival rate of order and the relative shortage cost.</p
<p>A indicates the comparison of T1–T2 and V1–V2, B indicates the comparison of T2–T4 and V2–V4, C i...
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 1 for different methods.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 2 for different methods.</p
<p>Performance Comparison with Existing Event Detection Methods (Precision, Recall, F-measure).</p