Criteria of psychometric quality rating based on Terwee et al. [50] and Schellingerhout et al. (2012).</p
<p>Criteria for Reliability and Validity Rating (modified after McDowell, 2006).</p
<p>Criteria for reporting methodological quality and consistency (adjusted from the criteria provide...
<p>Methodological quality assessment ratings based on the Effective Public Health Practice Project t...
Quality of psychometric properties based on the criteria by Terwee et al. [51] and Schellingerhout [...
Overall quality score of assessments for each psychometric property based on levels of evidence by S...
Quality criteria for psychometric properties of measurement (adapted from Hair Jr et al. [28], Pedro...
Criteria for overall assessment of psychometric properties according to COSMIN (Mokkink et al. 2018,...
<p>Rating: + = positive, ? = intermediate, − = negative, 0 = no information available. Bold lines s...
<p>Rating: + = positive, ? = intermediate, - = negative, 0 = no information available.</p><p>Quality...
Methodological quality assessment of studies on psychometric properties of the included measures.</p
<p>Terwee’s quality criteria for measurement properties [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/inf...
<p>For the study of Tyl et al. (2002), of the 45 criteria, the figure represents only the 35 controv...
Criteria for the quality assessment of the studies (adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence ...
<p>For the report of Stump (2009), of the possible 45, the figure represents only the 16 controversi...
Quality of each psychometric property of needs assessment tools in cancer patients.</p
<p>Criteria for Reliability and Validity Rating (modified after McDowell, 2006).</p
<p>Criteria for reporting methodological quality and consistency (adjusted from the criteria provide...
<p>Methodological quality assessment ratings based on the Effective Public Health Practice Project t...
Quality of psychometric properties based on the criteria by Terwee et al. [51] and Schellingerhout [...
Overall quality score of assessments for each psychometric property based on levels of evidence by S...
Quality criteria for psychometric properties of measurement (adapted from Hair Jr et al. [28], Pedro...
Criteria for overall assessment of psychometric properties according to COSMIN (Mokkink et al. 2018,...
<p>Rating: + = positive, ? = intermediate, − = negative, 0 = no information available. Bold lines s...
<p>Rating: + = positive, ? = intermediate, - = negative, 0 = no information available.</p><p>Quality...
Methodological quality assessment of studies on psychometric properties of the included measures.</p
<p>Terwee’s quality criteria for measurement properties [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/inf...
<p>For the study of Tyl et al. (2002), of the 45 criteria, the figure represents only the 35 controv...
Criteria for the quality assessment of the studies (adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence ...
<p>For the report of Stump (2009), of the possible 45, the figure represents only the 16 controversi...
Quality of each psychometric property of needs assessment tools in cancer patients.</p
<p>Criteria for Reliability and Validity Rating (modified after McDowell, 2006).</p
<p>Criteria for reporting methodological quality and consistency (adjusted from the criteria provide...
<p>Methodological quality assessment ratings based on the Effective Public Health Practice Project t...
DOI
Add to ORKG