Table of tcMEP latencies and amplitudes on the forelimb and on the hind limb as well as latencies and amplitudes of median and tibial SSEPs.</p
<p>Symbols indicated significant main effects or interactions. Note that in the PREP phase, a signif...
Changes in sEMG median frequency (MF, panel A) and root mean square (RMS, panel B) between the comfo...
<p>Largest ICCs values of each comparison are in bold. ECR: extensor carpi radialis; FDI: first dors...
Table of tcMEP latencies and amplitudes on the forelimb and on the hind limb as well as latencies an...
(Note that data of able-bodied individuals and TTA are retrieved from Cz, and data of TFA mainly fro...
List of all the significant effects (or trends) on the amplitudes of each component at their respect...
<p>Comparison of sural SNAP and peroneal CMAP potential amplitudes between normal and abnormal exam ...
<p><b>A</b>, <b>B</b>: Non-rectified waveform averages (evoked at 0.2 Hz) of flexor carpi radialis (...
<p>Slow, middle and fast indicate 0.75, 1.0 and 1.25 Hz, respectively.</p><p>Mean BB MEP amplitude (...
Contingency table for the anatomical structure evaluations of the paired T2-weighted scans without m...
Measurement of the input–output (IO) curves of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcrani...
<p>Estimated power spectral densities of EMG signals from the right tibialis anterior (TA) muscle.</...
<p>The dashed line indicates the mean onset of left and right deltoid. * Indicates a significant dif...
Comparison of the three dominant sinusoid amplitudes, frequencies and phases in the sagittal, fronta...
<p>(A) An average of 20 trials of MEPs recorded in the FDI during the no contact, ulnar, medial and ...
<p>Symbols indicated significant main effects or interactions. Note that in the PREP phase, a signif...
Changes in sEMG median frequency (MF, panel A) and root mean square (RMS, panel B) between the comfo...
<p>Largest ICCs values of each comparison are in bold. ECR: extensor carpi radialis; FDI: first dors...
Table of tcMEP latencies and amplitudes on the forelimb and on the hind limb as well as latencies an...
(Note that data of able-bodied individuals and TTA are retrieved from Cz, and data of TFA mainly fro...
List of all the significant effects (or trends) on the amplitudes of each component at their respect...
<p>Comparison of sural SNAP and peroneal CMAP potential amplitudes between normal and abnormal exam ...
<p><b>A</b>, <b>B</b>: Non-rectified waveform averages (evoked at 0.2 Hz) of flexor carpi radialis (...
<p>Slow, middle and fast indicate 0.75, 1.0 and 1.25 Hz, respectively.</p><p>Mean BB MEP amplitude (...
Contingency table for the anatomical structure evaluations of the paired T2-weighted scans without m...
Measurement of the input–output (IO) curves of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcrani...
<p>Estimated power spectral densities of EMG signals from the right tibialis anterior (TA) muscle.</...
<p>The dashed line indicates the mean onset of left and right deltoid. * Indicates a significant dif...
Comparison of the three dominant sinusoid amplitudes, frequencies and phases in the sagittal, fronta...
<p>(A) An average of 20 trials of MEPs recorded in the FDI during the no contact, ulnar, medial and ...
<p>Symbols indicated significant main effects or interactions. Note that in the PREP phase, a signif...
Changes in sEMG median frequency (MF, panel A) and root mean square (RMS, panel B) between the comfo...
<p>Largest ICCs values of each comparison are in bold. ECR: extensor carpi radialis; FDI: first dors...