Comparison of pair-wise FST estimates between four wild RJF and four DC populations.</p
<p>Mean pairwise F<i>st</i> values for various loci between studied populations.</p
<p>Pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> (below diagonal) and <i>P</i> values for exact test of popu...
<p>Pair-wise F<sub>ST</sub> estimates among <i>T</i>. <i>annulata</i> populations in Oman, as well a...
<p><i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> estimates significantly greater than zero after correction for multiple com...
<p>Pairwise <i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> among the studied breeds/populations (with confidence intervals at...
<p>Estimates of pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> between six Nile perch populations.</p
<p><i>Fst</i> estimates appear above the diagonal and pairwise genetic distance appears below the di...
<p>Distribution of pairwise <i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> among roosting groups within localities (from micr...
<p>Pairwise <i>F<sub>ST</sub></i> measured between STRUCTURAMA-inferred populations with nDNA.</p
<p>Comparisons in bold were significantly differentiated after adjusting the critical value using th...
<p>Pairwise θ <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0045520#pone.004...
<p>Estimates of pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> values (above the diagonals) and <i>G</i><sub>...
<p>Pairwise F<sub>ST</sub><sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone...
<p>All pairwise comparisons are statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.01) after FDR correction.</p
<p>Significant p-values (p≤0.05) indicated in bold. DP = Dry Prong, FP = Fort Polk, KNF = Kisa...
<p>Mean pairwise F<i>st</i> values for various loci between studied populations.</p
<p>Pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> (below diagonal) and <i>P</i> values for exact test of popu...
<p>Pair-wise F<sub>ST</sub> estimates among <i>T</i>. <i>annulata</i> populations in Oman, as well a...
<p><i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> estimates significantly greater than zero after correction for multiple com...
<p>Pairwise <i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> among the studied breeds/populations (with confidence intervals at...
<p>Estimates of pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> between six Nile perch populations.</p
<p><i>Fst</i> estimates appear above the diagonal and pairwise genetic distance appears below the di...
<p>Distribution of pairwise <i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> among roosting groups within localities (from micr...
<p>Pairwise <i>F<sub>ST</sub></i> measured between STRUCTURAMA-inferred populations with nDNA.</p
<p>Comparisons in bold were significantly differentiated after adjusting the critical value using th...
<p>Pairwise θ <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0045520#pone.004...
<p>Estimates of pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> values (above the diagonals) and <i>G</i><sub>...
<p>Pairwise F<sub>ST</sub><sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone...
<p>All pairwise comparisons are statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.01) after FDR correction.</p
<p>Significant p-values (p≤0.05) indicated in bold. DP = Dry Prong, FP = Fort Polk, KNF = Kisa...
<p>Mean pairwise F<i>st</i> values for various loci between studied populations.</p
<p>Pairwise <i>F</i><sub><i>ST</i></sub> (below diagonal) and <i>P</i> values for exact test of popu...
<p>Pair-wise F<sub>ST</sub> estimates among <i>T</i>. <i>annulata</i> populations in Oman, as well a...
DOI
Add to ORKG