The P-values were calculated using Mann-Whitney test, and significance was compared against the control group. *P P < 0.01.</p
The genera with significant richness difference (P < 0.05, computed by STAMP) between the two groups...
(A) Heat map of different genera in the gut microbiota. A, healthy; B, processed food; C, fish and s...
<p>(A) Unweighted principal coordinate analysis plot of the first two principal coordinates categori...
<p>The plotted values are the mean abundance of the 8 abundant genera and 1 abundant order in each g...
(A) Bacterial phylum levels of each sample in the groups of control, GDM_A1 and GDM_A2 respectively....
The groups of control (n=14), GDM_A1 (n=15), GDM_A2 (n=5) and GDM_Total (n=A1+A2=20) were described ...
<p>CON, control group; AMI, acute myocardial infarction group; SHAM, sham group.</p
<p>Mann Whitney test.</p><p>Phylum-level comparison of fecal microbiota in normal (N) and L2-treated...
Relative abundance at the genus level of the groups studied. BF, breastfeeding; FF, formula-feeding;...
<p>Student’s paired t-test of gut bacterial abundance data to generate a p-value (<i>p</i>). Signifi...
<p>A. Fraction of sequence counts in each of the individual samples, color coded by sample group. Gr...
Counts of methanogenic taxa in the gut microbiota: Comparison between experimental groups.</p
Test statistics of bacterial phyla that significantly differ between the two tissue types are indica...
<p>(A) Unweighted principal coordinate analysis plot of the first two principal coordinates categori...
<p>The values represent bacterial DNA counts in gut microbiome. (A) Total bacterial counts; (B) Pseu...
The genera with significant richness difference (P < 0.05, computed by STAMP) between the two groups...
(A) Heat map of different genera in the gut microbiota. A, healthy; B, processed food; C, fish and s...
<p>(A) Unweighted principal coordinate analysis plot of the first two principal coordinates categori...
<p>The plotted values are the mean abundance of the 8 abundant genera and 1 abundant order in each g...
(A) Bacterial phylum levels of each sample in the groups of control, GDM_A1 and GDM_A2 respectively....
The groups of control (n=14), GDM_A1 (n=15), GDM_A2 (n=5) and GDM_Total (n=A1+A2=20) were described ...
<p>CON, control group; AMI, acute myocardial infarction group; SHAM, sham group.</p
<p>Mann Whitney test.</p><p>Phylum-level comparison of fecal microbiota in normal (N) and L2-treated...
Relative abundance at the genus level of the groups studied. BF, breastfeeding; FF, formula-feeding;...
<p>Student’s paired t-test of gut bacterial abundance data to generate a p-value (<i>p</i>). Signifi...
<p>A. Fraction of sequence counts in each of the individual samples, color coded by sample group. Gr...
Counts of methanogenic taxa in the gut microbiota: Comparison between experimental groups.</p
Test statistics of bacterial phyla that significantly differ between the two tissue types are indica...
<p>(A) Unweighted principal coordinate analysis plot of the first two principal coordinates categori...
<p>The values represent bacterial DNA counts in gut microbiome. (A) Total bacterial counts; (B) Pseu...
The genera with significant richness difference (P < 0.05, computed by STAMP) between the two groups...
(A) Heat map of different genera in the gut microbiota. A, healthy; B, processed food; C, fish and s...
<p>(A) Unweighted principal coordinate analysis plot of the first two principal coordinates categori...