A: Scatterplot of the EMT factor versus the sum of the RNA expression of COL11A1 and THBS2 (CPM: count per million). B: Pearson correlation (ρ) between the factors and cell type fractions. Only significant correlations (p 0.2) are shown.</p
<p>(B) mTOR protein was analyzed in four different breast cancer cell lines and a breast epithelial ...
<p>This table was compiled from different sources <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/1...
<p>Association with risk of breast cancer for rs11977670 stratified by breast cancer tumour subtypes...
Abstract Epidemiological studies have a clear definition of the risk factors for breast cancer. Howe...
a<p>p-value from Chi-square test for ER+ vs. HER2+ER–PR–.</p>b<p>p-value from <i>Kruskal-Wallis</i> ...
<p>A) This bar plot compares standard deviations of module scores in representative BCCL (a composit...
Spearman correlations were calculated between the full panel expressions and the expressions of the ...
<p>Correlations between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and clinicopathological parameters in 52 loca...
<p>The significant values of the Pearson's correlation analysis were confirmed by the Spearman's tes...
True and predicted expressions were compared for each marker and subtype individually.</p
<p>S-score comparison for the 50 top oncogenes and 50 top tumor suppressors between ER-PR- and ER+PR...
<p>PD: population density, PNA: percentage of non-agriculture population, SIO: second industry outpu...
<p>* p = 0.019 indicating a significant difference at the 5% level</p><p>A,B; different letters indi...
<p>Underlined letters concern the correlation between miRs across triple negative breast cancer. The...
Figure created with BioRender.com. The current study analyzed 18F–FLT uptake, immune infiltrate leve...
<p>(B) mTOR protein was analyzed in four different breast cancer cell lines and a breast epithelial ...
<p>This table was compiled from different sources <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/1...
<p>Association with risk of breast cancer for rs11977670 stratified by breast cancer tumour subtypes...
Abstract Epidemiological studies have a clear definition of the risk factors for breast cancer. Howe...
a<p>p-value from Chi-square test for ER+ vs. HER2+ER–PR–.</p>b<p>p-value from <i>Kruskal-Wallis</i> ...
<p>A) This bar plot compares standard deviations of module scores in representative BCCL (a composit...
Spearman correlations were calculated between the full panel expressions and the expressions of the ...
<p>Correlations between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and clinicopathological parameters in 52 loca...
<p>The significant values of the Pearson's correlation analysis were confirmed by the Spearman's tes...
True and predicted expressions were compared for each marker and subtype individually.</p
<p>S-score comparison for the 50 top oncogenes and 50 top tumor suppressors between ER-PR- and ER+PR...
<p>PD: population density, PNA: percentage of non-agriculture population, SIO: second industry outpu...
<p>* p = 0.019 indicating a significant difference at the 5% level</p><p>A,B; different letters indi...
<p>Underlined letters concern the correlation between miRs across triple negative breast cancer. The...
Figure created with BioRender.com. The current study analyzed 18F–FLT uptake, immune infiltrate leve...
<p>(B) mTOR protein was analyzed in four different breast cancer cell lines and a breast epithelial ...
<p>This table was compiled from different sources <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/1...
<p>Association with risk of breast cancer for rs11977670 stratified by breast cancer tumour subtypes...
DOI
Add to ORKG