Cost-effectiveness of intervention strategies for AMD screening (A) all strategies (top) and (B) excluding dominated strategies (bottom).</p
<p>NB: The line represents the cost-effectiveness threshold, or frontier. All interventions or combi...
<p>Cost effectiveness is shown in terms of illness attack rate (%) and cost in million dollars per 1...
<p>Total costs and total QALYs are shown for each strategy. The cost-effectiveness frontier, illustr...
Cost-effectiveness plane comparing the effectiveness of status quo (no screening) and the four scree...
Different strategies for screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults: cost effectiveness a...
<p>Cost-effectiveness plane presenting all non-dominated and selected dominated screening protocols ...
<p>The strategies included in quadrant I were more effective and more costly than “<i>Screening stra...
<p>Strategies standing on the curve are dominant strategies, indicating that they cost less and had ...
<p>The investment costs in millions in US$ (2007) are depicted on the ho...
<p>Note: Uni.OAE+AABR = universal strategy using OAE plus AABR; Uni.OAE = universal strategy using O...
OBJECTIVE To determine whether grading for AMD during a diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening progra...
<p>Description of strategies for cost-effectiveness analysis based on the anti-HCV level classificat...
<p>Cost-effectiveness of screening strategy alone combined with 10-years-old girl vaccination.</p
<p>The cost-effectiveness frontier (solid line) includes strategies that maybe cost-effective if the...
<p>Cost-effectiveness of the six analysed interventions to reduce alcohol consumption (one year inte...
<p>NB: The line represents the cost-effectiveness threshold, or frontier. All interventions or combi...
<p>Cost effectiveness is shown in terms of illness attack rate (%) and cost in million dollars per 1...
<p>Total costs and total QALYs are shown for each strategy. The cost-effectiveness frontier, illustr...
Cost-effectiveness plane comparing the effectiveness of status quo (no screening) and the four scree...
Different strategies for screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults: cost effectiveness a...
<p>Cost-effectiveness plane presenting all non-dominated and selected dominated screening protocols ...
<p>The strategies included in quadrant I were more effective and more costly than “<i>Screening stra...
<p>Strategies standing on the curve are dominant strategies, indicating that they cost less and had ...
<p>The investment costs in millions in US$ (2007) are depicted on the ho...
<p>Note: Uni.OAE+AABR = universal strategy using OAE plus AABR; Uni.OAE = universal strategy using O...
OBJECTIVE To determine whether grading for AMD during a diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening progra...
<p>Description of strategies for cost-effectiveness analysis based on the anti-HCV level classificat...
<p>Cost-effectiveness of screening strategy alone combined with 10-years-old girl vaccination.</p
<p>The cost-effectiveness frontier (solid line) includes strategies that maybe cost-effective if the...
<p>Cost-effectiveness of the six analysed interventions to reduce alcohol consumption (one year inte...
<p>NB: The line represents the cost-effectiveness threshold, or frontier. All interventions or combi...
<p>Cost effectiveness is shown in terms of illness attack rate (%) and cost in million dollars per 1...
<p>Total costs and total QALYs are shown for each strategy. The cost-effectiveness frontier, illustr...
DOI
Add to ORKG