Top panel shows the CV accuracy between two runs that have different global activity levels with and without mean centering. Bottom panel shows the difference between them. Standard errors were below 0.1% for all cells.</p
<p>(a) Mean target position error for the horizontal and the vertical target motion conditions for e...
<p>*, post-hoc effect for the Sick group, sway was reduced during performance of the Search task, re...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. Bottom Panel: Mean difference in the percentage of straight ahead resp...
Percent increase in balanced CV prediction accuracies with mean centering. Each cell shows the CV ac...
6 runs of data was simulated with ISI drawn from U(0, 4), and noise std. = 0.8. Single trial estimat...
<p>A) ON-centre cells show significantly higher mean contrast gain than OFF-centre cells (<i>t</i>-t...
<p>Results for the different head-roll orientations are shown separately. The number of traces (n) t...
<p>The columns represent different cut-plane orientations and the rows correspond to the different c...
<p>*, post-hoc difference between Well and Sick groups after boxers completed their warm-up routine,...
<p>Panel A shows the difference between pianists and controls; panel B shows the difference when the...
Top panels: Mean proportion correct responses (left panel) and response times (right panel) when the...
<p>Two basic relationships were observed: the left panel shows a highly linear relationship between ...
<p>CNR = Contrast to Noise Ratio. MTF10% = the 10% point of the modulation transfer function. Upper,...
<p>Traces with significant (p < 0.05) CW, significant CCW and non-significant drift while roll-tilte...
<p>Panel A shows the difference when the exposure time of video-clips was shorter (460 and 740 ms) a...
<p>(a) Mean target position error for the horizontal and the vertical target motion conditions for e...
<p>*, post-hoc effect for the Sick group, sway was reduced during performance of the Search task, re...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. Bottom Panel: Mean difference in the percentage of straight ahead resp...
Percent increase in balanced CV prediction accuracies with mean centering. Each cell shows the CV ac...
6 runs of data was simulated with ISI drawn from U(0, 4), and noise std. = 0.8. Single trial estimat...
<p>A) ON-centre cells show significantly higher mean contrast gain than OFF-centre cells (<i>t</i>-t...
<p>Results for the different head-roll orientations are shown separately. The number of traces (n) t...
<p>The columns represent different cut-plane orientations and the rows correspond to the different c...
<p>*, post-hoc difference between Well and Sick groups after boxers completed their warm-up routine,...
<p>Panel A shows the difference between pianists and controls; panel B shows the difference when the...
Top panels: Mean proportion correct responses (left panel) and response times (right panel) when the...
<p>Two basic relationships were observed: the left panel shows a highly linear relationship between ...
<p>CNR = Contrast to Noise Ratio. MTF10% = the 10% point of the modulation transfer function. Upper,...
<p>Traces with significant (p < 0.05) CW, significant CCW and non-significant drift while roll-tilte...
<p>Panel A shows the difference when the exposure time of video-clips was shorter (460 and 740 ms) a...
<p>(a) Mean target position error for the horizontal and the vertical target motion conditions for e...
<p>*, post-hoc effect for the Sick group, sway was reduced during performance of the Search task, re...
<p>Error bars show +/1 S.E.M. Bottom Panel: Mean difference in the percentage of straight ahead resp...
DOI
Add to ORKG