Boxplots comparing cover percentage of plots with or without application of pine oil and seeding treatments.</p
Box and whiskers plot showing the relationship between hafting methods and hafting effectiveness.</p
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for evapora...
Forest plot of constant score between the treatment of acromioplasty and nonacromioplasty.</p
Boxplots comparing seedbank abundance of plots with or without application of pine oil and seeding t...
Boxplots comparing percentage cover of Galenia pubescens plots with or without application of glypho...
Boxplots comparing seedbank of Galenia pubescens abundance of plots with or without application of m...
Box plot comparing distribution of vegetation growth results by plot for Puerto and PaL.</p
Ground cover percentage of different crop residue types and ages estimated by ASSESS 2.0 [45].</p
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for tactile...
<p>Forest plots showing the re-operation rates (boxes) with 95% confidence of intervals (CIs; bars)....
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for tactile...
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for evapora...
<p>Forest plots showing the infection rates (boxes) with 95% confidence of intervals (CIs; bars).</p
Box and whiskers plot showing the relationship between hafting methods and hafting effectiveness.</p
<p>Forest plot of the accuracy of chlamydia self-collection compared to clinician collection.</p
Box and whiskers plot showing the relationship between hafting methods and hafting effectiveness.</p
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for evapora...
Forest plot of constant score between the treatment of acromioplasty and nonacromioplasty.</p
Boxplots comparing seedbank abundance of plots with or without application of pine oil and seeding t...
Boxplots comparing percentage cover of Galenia pubescens plots with or without application of glypho...
Boxplots comparing seedbank of Galenia pubescens abundance of plots with or without application of m...
Box plot comparing distribution of vegetation growth results by plot for Puerto and PaL.</p
Ground cover percentage of different crop residue types and ages estimated by ASSESS 2.0 [45].</p
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for tactile...
<p>Forest plots showing the re-operation rates (boxes) with 95% confidence of intervals (CIs; bars)....
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for tactile...
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for evapora...
<p>Forest plots showing the infection rates (boxes) with 95% confidence of intervals (CIs; bars).</p
Box and whiskers plot showing the relationship between hafting methods and hafting effectiveness.</p
<p>Forest plot of the accuracy of chlamydia self-collection compared to clinician collection.</p
Box and whiskers plot showing the relationship between hafting methods and hafting effectiveness.</p
<p>Forest plot comparing a prophylaxis paste containing 15% CSPS with a negative control for evapora...
Forest plot of constant score between the treatment of acromioplasty and nonacromioplasty.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG