The relationship between the number of potential sites for a given type of mutations and the number of the mutations of the same type. As expected, there is a strong positive association between the number of potential sites and the number of reported mutations similar to what was observed for the gene size. (DOCX 1370 kb
Log10 of total mutations per genome, ordered by median mutations within each tumour type. Figure S2:...
For each patient undergoing exome sequencing, a full list of the mutations passing filters and their...
Figure S1. Test of the Poisson distribution of nonsense mutations in URA3. Figure S2. The effect of ...
The relationship between the proportion of CpG sites and the mutation densities. Proportion of CpGs ...
The relationship between the observed and expected number of frameshift mutations. Each dot represen...
The relationship between the observed and expected number of nonsense mutations. Each dot represents...
The relationship between nucleotide diversity of the gene sequences and the densities of somatic mut...
Genes with a higher than expected number of frameshift, missense, or nonsense mutations. Genes sorte...
Olfactory genes and densities of missense mutations. First row shows the proportion of olfactory gen...
Relative frequencies of non-coding mutation contexts in different cancer types. (top panel) Three ca...
Shown are 50 genes selected via stability selection. A list of 50 genes that are most frequently ran...
Abstract Background Because driver mutations provide selective advantage to the mutant clone, they t...
Abstract Background Because driver mutations provide ...
Figure S2. Percent of statistically significant predictive models identified in our analysis using e...
Section S1POLE mutation patterns in colon cancer samples. Section S2 Detailed forward model selectio...
Log10 of total mutations per genome, ordered by median mutations within each tumour type. Figure S2:...
For each patient undergoing exome sequencing, a full list of the mutations passing filters and their...
Figure S1. Test of the Poisson distribution of nonsense mutations in URA3. Figure S2. The effect of ...
The relationship between the proportion of CpG sites and the mutation densities. Proportion of CpGs ...
The relationship between the observed and expected number of frameshift mutations. Each dot represen...
The relationship between the observed and expected number of nonsense mutations. Each dot represents...
The relationship between nucleotide diversity of the gene sequences and the densities of somatic mut...
Genes with a higher than expected number of frameshift, missense, or nonsense mutations. Genes sorte...
Olfactory genes and densities of missense mutations. First row shows the proportion of olfactory gen...
Relative frequencies of non-coding mutation contexts in different cancer types. (top panel) Three ca...
Shown are 50 genes selected via stability selection. A list of 50 genes that are most frequently ran...
Abstract Background Because driver mutations provide selective advantage to the mutant clone, they t...
Abstract Background Because driver mutations provide ...
Figure S2. Percent of statistically significant predictive models identified in our analysis using e...
Section S1POLE mutation patterns in colon cancer samples. Section S2 Detailed forward model selectio...
Log10 of total mutations per genome, ordered by median mutations within each tumour type. Figure S2:...
For each patient undergoing exome sequencing, a full list of the mutations passing filters and their...
Figure S1. Test of the Poisson distribution of nonsense mutations in URA3. Figure S2. The effect of ...