Table S2. Microcirculatory perfusion parameters by study arm. This table shows the distribution of patients and mortality rates by study arm included in the ancillary study. Overall, the mortality rates among the groups were similar. (DOCX 13 kb
Table S1. Rationale for Mahalanobis distance variable selection in the propensity matching of vasopr...
Table S1. Metrics and basic statistics of sequencing data. This table reports the number of reads pr...
Table S2. Multivariable linear regression for organ-failure-free days (composite of renal, hepatic, ...
Table S1. The overall ProCESS population compared with the population enrolled in the microcirculato...
Table S3. Microcirculatory perfusion analysis by study arm. In a comparison of study parameters, onl...
BackgroundWe sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on microcircula...
Figure S1. Hemodynamics assessed by thermodilution. Box and whisker blots showing extended hemodynam...
Abstract Background We sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on mi...
Figure S1. Hemodynamic parameters and urine output at each time point in the cohort study of patient...
Names of all ethical bodies/institutional review board of all institution that approved your study i...
Table S1. Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of various variables regarding septic AKI and in-hospital...
Figure S2. Correlations of MPO-DNA and cf-DNA levels with organ failure parameters. Correlations of ...
Figure S1. Missing rate for clinical and laboratory variables extracted from the database. Variables...
p Values of the two-way ANOVA comparing cellular counts over time between survivors and nonsurvivors...
Table S1. Study characteristics: management description of included randomized controlled trials. Ta...
Table S1. Rationale for Mahalanobis distance variable selection in the propensity matching of vasopr...
Table S1. Metrics and basic statistics of sequencing data. This table reports the number of reads pr...
Table S2. Multivariable linear regression for organ-failure-free days (composite of renal, hepatic, ...
Table S1. The overall ProCESS population compared with the population enrolled in the microcirculato...
Table S3. Microcirculatory perfusion analysis by study arm. In a comparison of study parameters, onl...
BackgroundWe sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on microcircula...
Figure S1. Hemodynamics assessed by thermodilution. Box and whisker blots showing extended hemodynam...
Abstract Background We sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on mi...
Figure S1. Hemodynamic parameters and urine output at each time point in the cohort study of patient...
Names of all ethical bodies/institutional review board of all institution that approved your study i...
Table S1. Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of various variables regarding septic AKI and in-hospital...
Figure S2. Correlations of MPO-DNA and cf-DNA levels with organ failure parameters. Correlations of ...
Figure S1. Missing rate for clinical and laboratory variables extracted from the database. Variables...
p Values of the two-way ANOVA comparing cellular counts over time between survivors and nonsurvivors...
Table S1. Study characteristics: management description of included randomized controlled trials. Ta...
Table S1. Rationale for Mahalanobis distance variable selection in the propensity matching of vasopr...
Table S1. Metrics and basic statistics of sequencing data. This table reports the number of reads pr...
Table S2. Multivariable linear regression for organ-failure-free days (composite of renal, hepatic, ...